Table 1.
Clinical and laboratory features | Classification | Pathological features |
---|---|---|
Duration >12 months | Clinico-pathologically defined IBM | All of the following: |
Age at onset >45 years | Endomysial inflammatory infiltrate | |
Rimmed vacuoles | ||
Knee extension weakness ≥hip flexion weakness and/or finger flexion weakness >should abduction weakness | Protein accumulationa or 15–18 nm filaments | |
CK no greater than 15 × ULN | ||
Duration >12 months | Clinically defined IBM | One or more, but not all, of: |
Age at onset >45 years | Endomysial inflammatory infiltrate | |
Knee extension weakness ≥hip flexion weakness and finger flexion weakness >should abduction weakness | Up-regulation of MHC-I | |
Rimmed vacuoles | ||
Protein accumulationa or 15–18 nm filaments | ||
CK no greater than 15 × ULN | ||
Duration >12 months | Probable IBM | One or more, but not all, of: |
Age at onset >45 years | Endomysial inflammatory infiltrate | |
Knee extension weakness ≥hip flexion weakness or finger flexion weakness >should abduction weakness | Up-regulation of MHC-I | |
Rimmed vacuoles | ||
Protein accumulationa or 15–18 nm filaments | ||
CK no greater than 15 × ULN |
aDemonstration of amyloid or other protein accumulation by established methods (e.g. for amyloid Congo red, crystal violet, thioflavin T/S, for other proteins p62, SMI-31, TDP-43). Current evidence favours p62 in terms of sensitivity and specificity but the literature is limited and further work required