Table 4.
Monte Carlo simulation results testing the hypothesis that the frequency and characteristics of collaboration ties remain stable from 2007 to 2010 and 2011 (n = 500 simulations)
Grants Cohort Network | Publications Cohort Network | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Network Statistic | Obs. 2007 | MC Simulation Mean | MC Simulation 95% CI | Obs. 2010a | Obs. 2007 | MC Simulation Mean | MC Simulation 95% CI | Obs. 2011b |
Density | 0.009 | 0.009 | .007, .010 | 0.023 | 0.007 | .007 | .006, .008 | 0.009 |
Cross‐disciplinary ratio | 1.21 | 1.22 | 0.87, 1.66 | 1.36 | 1.18 | 1.20 | .874, 1.56 | 1.25 |
E‐I index | 0.176 | 0.175 | .014, .327 | 0.319 | 0.156 | 0.158 | .008, .291 | 0.208 |
Modularity | 0.140 | 0.138 | .082, .196 | 0.054 | 0.093 | 0.102 | .052, .155 | 0.071 |
aDensity and modularity of the observed 2010 grant network fall outside of the 95% CI generated by the simulated 2007 network.
bDensity of the observed 2011 publication network falls outside of the 95% CI generated by the simulated 2007 network.