Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2015 Mar 13;53:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.092

Figure 2. Tensile properties of regenerated esophageal tissues supported by implant and sham control groups.

Figure 2

[A] Representative stress-strain profiles of experimental groups at 2 m post-op. [B–D] Evaluation of ultimate tensile strength (UTS), elongation to failure (ETF), and elastic modulus (EM) in cohorts defined in [A]. Means ± standard deviation per data point. (*) = p<0.05 in comparison to all other groups.