Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 22;5:9899. doi: 10.1038/srep09899

Table 5. Comparison of the information obtained from crossing each of the susceptibility maps with the map of landslides distribution.

Method of slide susceptibility map susceptibility classes Si (Km2) Ai (Km2) Density of slide in any class Density of slide in the whole map Σln (Si/Ai) Landslide index (Li) in any class percent Ks (km2) S (km2) P
AHP Low 1.57 9.27 0.10 0.20 0.100 28.32 1.62 6.27 0.84
Moderate 3.08 19.09 0.24 36.23
High 1.09 8.33 0.12 24.18
Very high 0.53 1.71 0.08 11.27
WLC Low 1.17 8.12 0.11 0.20 0.100 22.34 1.07 6.27 0.79
Moderate 4.03 24.33 0.45 46.56
High 0.89 4.94 0.08 17.12
Very high 0.18 1.01 0.01 7.10
SMCE Low 0.41 1.10 0.05 0.20 0.100 10.16 5.25 6.27 0.96
Moderate 0.61 2.87 0.09 13.18
High 1.93 11.34 0.13 29.14
Very high 3.32 23.09 0.39 47.52