Semi-structured telephone interviews (N = 647) |
|
Interviewer: |
For both sources of data: |
|
• How each core element is being implemented |
• Trained to take extensive notes, including key verbatim phrases to record content of each interview |
• Investigators regularly reviewed interviewer’s and TA providers’ interview summaries and field notes |
|
• Adaptations made to the core elements |
• Cleaned each summary note, making sure team had data on each relevant topic in interview guide |
• Bi-weekly meetings addressed TA and field notes |
|
• Rationale for adaptation |
• Indicated verbatim phrases |
• Discussions focused on barriers and facilitators to effective implementation, as well as how to address them in TA |
|
• Problems encountered in implementation |
• Ensured accurate record of interview content and interview conditions (i.e., level of rapport, apparent distractions, general level of flow for each interview) |
• Field notes, summaries, and analytical codes applied to relevant sections of each summary note were entered into qualitative database |
|
• Approaches used to overcome challenges |
|
|
Extensive field notes and commentary |
|
TA providers: |
|
|
• Barriers and facilitators to implementation fidelity |
• Had been coordinators in prior efficacy trials, and were extensively trained and supervised in previous research |
|
|
• Problems encountered in implementation |
• Thus had clear understanding of fidelity to original implementation methods |
|
|
• Approaches used to overcome challenges |
• Jotted extensive notes during all TA sessions (delivered by telephone and/or e-mail) |
|
|
|
• Subsequently created detailed commentary about each TA session, operationalized as fieldnotes |
|
|
|
• Were trained on the study domains (barriers and facilitators to intervention fidelity) to ensure recording of relevant data when topics of interest arose during TA |
|
|
|
• Used template for TA fieldnotes, which contained headings for each relevant study topic where notes were taken |
|