Table 2.

Blood lipid profile of different treatment (mean ± SD) (n = 8, each)

YXC (g/kg)	Swimming (h)	TC (mmol/L)		LDL (mmol/L)		TG (mmol/L)		HDL (mmol/L)
0	0	2.56 ± 0.42		0.84 ± 0.15		1.49 ± 0.86		0.69 ± 0.18
0	0.5	2.39 ± 0.40		1.00 ± 0.33		0.95 ± 0.50		0.94 ± 0.52
0	1	2.39 ± 0.45		0.82 ± 0.22		0.45 ± 0.07		0.84 ± 0.16
1	0	2.10 ± 0.30		0.60 ± 0.23		0.62 ± 0.20		1.32 ± 0.30
1	0.5	2.65 ± 0.18		0.92 ± 0.16		0.78 ± 0.38		1.27 ± 0.31
1	1	2.38 ± 0.72		0.96 ± 0.28		1.24 ± 0.47		1.25 ± 0.32
2	0	2.07 ± 0.16		0.88 ± 0.04		0.76 ± 0.42		1.17 ± 0.19
2	0.5	2.31 ± 0.55		0.94 ± 0.31		0.68 ± 0.28		1.12 ± 0.33
2	1	1.77 ± 0.36		0.70 ± 0.10		0.47 ± 0.18		1.06 ± 0.20
Two-way ANOVA		F	P	F	P	F	P	F	P
YXC		4.098	0.022	0.419	0.660	2.387	0.098	10.628	0.000
Swimming		1.929	0.155	3.459	0.038	1.396	0.249	0.219	0.804
YXC × Swimming		1.782	0.146	3.950	0.028	5.480	0.001	0.566	0.689

All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The GLM procedure was applied for a two-way ANOVA to test for synergism effect. Comparisons between each pair of factor levels were analyzed using a Bonferon post hoc test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.