Table 4.
Structural remodeling measurement of different treatment (mean ± SD) (n = 8, each)
| YXC (g/kg) | Swimming (h) | Wall thickness (um) | Circumference (um) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 28.65 ± 5.66 | 678.91 ± 73.86 | ||
| 0 | 0.5 | 22.91 ± 4.01 | 744.99 ± 64.06 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 21.33 ± 2.55 | 731.37 ± 59.84 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 25.46 ± 5.75 | 706.91 ± 86.70 | ||
| 1 | 0.5 | 22.88 ± 4.14 | 680.58 ± 50.25 | ||
| 1 | 1 | 22.61 ± 5.82 | 714.39 ± 65.46 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 21.46 ± 2.81 | 719.61 ± 58.98 | ||
| 2 | 0.5 | 22.67 ± 2.66 | 699.70 ± 63.79 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 24.28 ± 4.69 | 736.37 ± 79.41 | ||
| Two-way ANOVA | F | P | F | P | |
| YXC | 0.577 | 0.565 | 1.195 | 0.310 | |
| Swimming | 2.088 | 0.133 | 0.291 | 0.748 | |
| YXC × Swimming | 2.350 | 0.047 | 0.171 | 0.952 | |
All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. The GLM procedure was applied for a two-way ANOVA to test for synergism effect. Comparisons between each pair of factor levels were analyzed using a Bonferon post hoc test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.