Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2013 Oct 12;39(2):399–405. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.022

Table 1.

Baseline demographics for the total sample, and the sample stratified by suicidal ideation status in the past year.

Variable Sub-category Total sample Sample stratified by suicidal ideation
SI− (N = 99) SI+ (N = 62) p
Age (years) Mean (SD) 51 (15) 51 (16) 52 (13) 0.58
Gender Males N (%) 151 (93%) 93 (93%) 58 (93%) 0.58
Race White N (%) 76 (47%) 48 (48%) 28 (45%) 0.52
Black N (%) 75 (46%) 44 (44%) 31 (50%)
Others N (%) 10 (6%) 7 (7%) 3 (4%)
Ethnicity Hispanic N (%) 5 (3%) 3 (3%) 2 (3%) 1.00
Marital status Single N (%) 104 (64%) 63 (63%) 41 (66%) 0.86
Married N (%) 57 (35%) 36 (36%) 21 (33%)
Vocational status Full-time N (%) 44 (27%) 35 (35%) 9 (14%) 0.74
Part-time N (%) 19 (11%) 14 (14%) 5 (8%)
Financial status Can make ends meet N (%) 109 (67%) 80 (80%) 29 (47%) <0.001
Cannot make ends meet N (%) 52 (32%) 19 (19%) 33 (53%)

SI− = absence of any suicidal ideation in the past year; SI+ = a positive response to ≥1 question on the Paykel questionnaire for suicidal ideation; financial status was assessed using the question, “have at least enough to get by or more”, and “cannot make ends meet”; SD = Standard Deviation.