Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: South Med J. 2009 Sep;102(9):890–893. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181b21b82

Table 1.

Unadjusted mean performance on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the CERAD Neuropsychological Assessment Battery as a function of ApoE ε4 statusa

ApoE ε4 positive
ApoE ε4 negative
Mean (SD) Range Mean (SD) Range P
Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (maximum possible points)
 Total score (144) 97.1 (17.2) 55–122 94.3 (17.6) 64–123 0.57
 Attention (37) 31.6 (3.6) 22–37 31.6 (4.4) 22–37 0.98
 Initiation/perseveration (37) 24.4 (7.4) 8–36 22.1 (6.7) 10–34 0.25
 Construction (6) 3.7 (1.6) 1–6 4.1 (1.6) 2–6 0.47
 Memory (25) 10.8 (3.2) 3–21 10.8 (3.3) 5–18 0.99
 Conceptualization (39) 26.5 (7.3) 5–37 24.8 (6.2) 15–34 0.39
CERAD
 Animal fluency (no limit) 8.3 (3.0) 4–16 7.2 (3.1) 2–12 0.25
 Boston Naming Test (15) 8.8 (2.6) 4–14 8.8 (2.4) 5–14 0.99
 Constructional praxis (11) 5.7 (2.5) 1–11 6.9 (1.4) 5–10 0.09
 Immediate total recall (30) 9.0 (3.8) 3–17 8.4 (3.2) 4–14 0.61
 Delayed total recall (10) 0.5 (0.9) 0–3 0.5 (0.9) 0–2 0.96
a

SD, standard deviation; CERAD, Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease.