Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Aug;16(4):332–342. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0269-8

Table 1.

Innovative and Emerging Models for Delivering Cancer Pain Education Programs

Randomized Trials
Reference Participants Intervention Findings
Kravitz et al., 2011 [19]
  • At least moderate pain severity or interference

  • Mixed cancers

  • N = 265

  • Single face-to-face session up to 1 hour

  • Compared tailored education and coaching (aimed at reducing pain misconceptions and enhancing skills and self-efficacy for communicating with physicians about pain) to enhanced usual care (provision of basic information about cancer pain management)

  • Delivered by trained lay health educators

  • Participants followed for 12 weeks

  • ↑ Pain communication self-efficacy

  • Temporary ↓ pain-related interference

  • No effects on pain intensity

Kroenke et al., 2010 [33]
  • At least moderate levels of pain and/or depression

  • Mixed cancers

  • N = 405

  • Patients from 16 community-based urban & rural oncology practices

  • Compared telephone-based centralized symptom education and management (at least 4 calls during first 3 months) to usual care

  • Included automated home-based symptom monitoring which guided care provided by nurse-physician specialist team

  • Nurse care manager logged mean of 157 minutes direct telephone time per patient in the intervention group (mean of 11 calls) during the 12 month trial

  • ↓ Pain intensity

  • ↓ Depression severity

  • Majority of patients found nurse care manager calls and automated symptom monitoring at least moderately helpful (82% and 73%, respectively)

Oldenmenger et al., 2011 [21]
  • Advanced stage + at least moderate pain

  • Mixed cancers

  • N = 72

  • Compared a multi-modal intervention (consultation with a pain specialist and tailored pain education from a palliative care nurse who also provided weekly phone-based monitoring of pain and side effects) to standard care

  • 8-week follow-up

  • ↓ Pain intensity + interference

  • ↑ Analgesic adherence

  • ↑ Pain knowledge

  • Pain management adequacy did not differ between groups

Thomas et al., 2012 [83]
  • At least mild pain

  • Mixed cancers

  • 90% male

  • N = 318

  • Three-group design comparing pain education (video and pamphlet), coaching (video and pamphlet + 4 telephone sessions of motivational interviewing to address pain management attitudes), and usual care

  • Delivered by advanced practice nurse

  • 6-month follow-up

  • ↓ Pain interference and ↑ mental health in coaching group compared to education or usual care groups

Smith et al., 2010 [22]
  • Breast cancer patients with persistent and moderate pain

  • N = 89

  • Compared a single 30-minute pain education/communication skills training session (i.e., myths/misconceptions about pain and analgesics; communicating with healthcare providers about one’s pain and doing in-session role plays; monitoring pain and in-session practice using a pain diary) to attention control

  • Delivered by interventionists with training in psychology, public health, or health education

  • 12-week follow-up

  • ↓ Pain barriers

  • No significant effect on pain relief, adequacy of pain management, distress, or quality of life