Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2014 Oct 22;0:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.10.012

Table 2.

Mapping sensitivity, precision, and recall values for sirFAST using simulated data sets with different error thresholds. We mapped 500,000 read pairs, and compared their “best” mapping locations with their true locations as simulated from the reference genome. Note that all numbers given above are for number of read pairs.

Format Data set TP FP FN Sensitivity Precision (PPV) Recall
1 set 1 (e=0) 481,379 17,528 1,093 96.28% 96.49% 99.77%
set 2 (e=1) 481,438 17,602 960 96.29% 96.47% 99.80%
set 3 (e=2) 480,966 18,137 897 96.19% 96.37% 99.81%
2 set 1 (e=0) 489,158 10,842 0 97.83% 97.83% 100.00%
set 2 (e=1) 488,142 11,775 62 97.62% 97.64% 99.98%
set 3 (e=2) 487,793 12,099 74 97.55% 97.57% 99.98%