Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 11;17(3):546–557. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9733-9

Table VII.

Comparisons of the Bioequivalence Recommendation for Clinical Efficacy Studies for Inhaled Corticosteroids and Bronchodilators from International Jurisdictions

International jurisdictions Clinical studies for inhaled ICS Clinical efficacy studies for bronchodilators
Therapeutic Goods Administration No detail provided Bronchodilation study is preferred
Bronchoprotection study alone is not sufficient but could serve as supporting study
Health Canada Quantitative sputum eosinophil counts
Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is also suggested
Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection studies
European Medicines Agency Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection studies
EMA guidance also mentioned in brief that other efficacy variables including expired nitric oxide (eNO) and sputum eosinophils, validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) could also be considered
Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection studies
Food and Drug Administration A confirmatory clinical study measuring lung function, no dose–response recommendation Bronchodilation and bronchoprotection studies

ICS inhaled corticosteriods, EMA European Medicines Association