Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 16;67(2):184–193. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2014-19

Table 4.

Accuracy Indices of Literature-Based and Sample-Based Cutoff Scores of the Significant Discriminators of the Faller (One or More Falls) and Recurrent Faller (Two or More Falls) Model

Measure and cutoff score type Cutoff score (≤) Sensitivity (TPR) Specificity (TNR) DOR PR
One or more falls (≥1F)
CB&M
 Lit. 45 0.71 0.60 3.64 0.62
 Sample 59 0.88* 0.53 8.00 0.62
Two or more falls (≥2F)
CB&M
 Lit. 45 0.93* 0.60 19.50 0.36
 Sample 39 0.79 0.76 11.61 0.36
ABC
 Lit. 67 0.21 0.96 6.55 0.36
 Sample 87 0.79* 0.88 26.89 0.36
DGI
 Lit. 19 0.64 0.72 4.63 0.36
 Sample 20 0.79 0.72 9.43 0.36
BBS
 Lit. 45 N/A N/A N/A N/A
 Sample 53 0.79 0.68 7.79 0.36
*

Statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between literature-based and sample-based cut-off scores within an assessment.

No participants below the literature-based cut-off score (BBS<45).

TPR=true positive ratio; TNR=true negative ratio; DOR=diagnostic odds ratio; PR=prevalence; Lit.=literature-based cut-off score; sample=sample-based cut-off score; CB&M=Community Balance and Mobility Scale; ABC=Activities-Specific Balance Confidence; DGI=Dynamic Gait Index; BBS=Berg Balance Scale; N/A=not applicable.