Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Apr;34(4):735–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.028

Table 1.

Casting Outcomes. Evidence of optimal casting for nondisplaced scaphoid fractures.

Study Purpose Methods Union rate
(%)
Average Time
to Union
Level of
Evidence
Authors'
Conclusions
Gellman et
al. (1989)
To compare Above
Elbow (AE) versus
Below Elbow (BE)
thumb-spica casts
for nondisplaced
fractures
51 patients
randomized into
two groups: 1) AE
for 6 weeks
followed by BE
2) BE
AE->BE:
28/28
(100%)

BE: 21/23
(91%)††
AE->BE: 9.5 weeks

BE: 12.7 weeks*
Ib
Prospective
data with
randomization
and control
6 weeks in an
above-elbow
thumb-spica
cast followed by
switch to
below-elbow
thumb-spica
cast
Clay et al.
(1991)
To compare
immobilization of
the thumb versus
leaving the thumb
free down to
metacarpal
392 patients
randomized into
two groups: 1)
Colles' cast with
thumb free (C)
2) "Scaphoid"
plaster cast (S)
C: 133/148
(90%)

S: 129/143
(90%)
C: 9 weeks

S: 9.6 weeks
Ib
Prospective
data with
randomization
and control
Undisplaced
waist fractures
should be
treated with
Colles' cast with
thumb free
Hambidge
et al. (1999)
To compare wrist
flexion (F) versus
wrist extension (E)
with the use of a
Colles' brace
121 patients
randomized into
two groups: 1)
Colles' with 20°
flexion (F)
2) Colles'with 20°
extension (E)
F: 53/58
(91%)

E: 55/63
(87%)
Unquantified;
Wrist extension
at 6 months:
F=61°; E=73°*
Ib
Prospective
data with
randomization
and control
The wrist
should be
positioned in
slight extension
to regain full
extension of
wrist
*

p< 0.05;

††

Significance unquantified;

Adapted from 'Table V' by adding “Definitely united” and “Probably united” (143 + 148 = 291; patient data missing)