Table 1.
Study | Purpose | Methods | Union rate (%) |
Average Time to Union |
Level of Evidence |
Authors' Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gellman et al. (1989) |
To compare Above Elbow (AE) versus Below Elbow (BE) thumb-spica casts for nondisplaced fractures |
51 patients randomized into two groups: 1) AE for 6 weeks followed by BE 2) BE |
AE->BE: 28/28 (100%) BE: 21/23 (91%)†† |
AE->BE: 9.5 weeks BE: 12.7 weeks* |
Ib Prospective data with randomization and control |
6 weeks in an above-elbow thumb-spica cast followed by switch to below-elbow thumb-spica cast |
Clay et al. (1991) |
To compare immobilization of the thumb versus leaving the thumb free down to metacarpal |
392 patients randomized into two groups: 1) Colles' cast with thumb free (C) 2) "Scaphoid" plaster cast (S) |
C: 133/148 (90%) S: 129/143 (90%)‡ |
C: 9 weeks S: 9.6 weeks |
Ib Prospective data with randomization and control |
Undisplaced waist fractures should be treated with Colles' cast with thumb free |
Hambidge et al. (1999) |
To compare wrist flexion (F) versus wrist extension (E) with the use of a Colles' brace |
121 patients randomized into two groups: 1) Colles' with 20° flexion (F) 2) Colles'with 20° extension (E) |
F: 53/58 (91%) E: 55/63 (87%) |
Unquantified; Wrist extension at 6 months: F=61°; E=73°* |
Ib Prospective data with randomization and control |
The wrist should be positioned in slight extension to regain full extension of wrist |
p< 0.05;
Significance unquantified;
Adapted from 'Table V' by adding “Definitely united” and “Probably united” (143 + 148 = 291; patient data missing)