Table 3. Comparing PIP2 binding to ezFERM and to Merlin constructs.
Kd (nM) | N | |
---|---|---|
ezFERM | 3311±888 | 1.86 |
mFERM | 3380±799 | 1.01 |
Merlin(WT) | 650±169 | 1.83 |
Merlin(518D) | 961±248 | 1.63 |
Kd (nM) | N | |
---|---|---|
ezFERM | 3311±888 | 1.86 |
mFERM | 3380±799 | 1.01 |
Merlin(WT) | 650±169 | 1.83 |
Merlin(518D) | 961±248 | 1.63 |