Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 27;61(4):1239–1250. doi: 10.1002/hep.27647

Table 5.

Changes in Liver Histology in Ezetimibe- Versus Placebo-Treated Patients

Ezetimibe (n = 17)
Placebo (n = 18)
Difference
Baseline Posttreatment P Value Baseline Posttreatment P Value (P Value)
Steatosis
 Median 2.0 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.2500 3.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.1133 0.0 (0.692)
 N grade 0/1/2/3 0/7/6/4 0/5/3/2 0/2/5/11 0/4/8/6
Lobular inflammation
 Median 1.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.2891 2.0 (1.0) 2.0 (1.0) 0.7266 0.0 (0.142)
 N grade 0/1/2/3 0/10/7/0 0/7/9/1 0/5/13/0 0/7/11/0
Ballooning
 Median 1.0 (1.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.2734 1.5 (1.0) 1.0 (1.0) 0.2891 0.0 (0.552)
 N grade 0/1/2 1/10/6 5/7/5 1/8/9 1/12/5
Fibrosis
 Median 1.0 (2.0) 1.0 (3.0) 1.000 1.0 (3.0) 1.0 (2.0) 0.3750 0.0 (0.222)
 N grade 0/1/2/3/4 5/6/2/3/1 7/3/2/5/0 6/5/1/5/1 4/6/2/5/1
NAFLD activity score
 Median 5.0 (2.0) 4.0 (2.0) 0.2910 5.0 (1.0) 5.0 (2.0) 0.1372 0.0 (0.927)
Ezetimibe n (%) Placebo n (%) Fisher's P value
2+ point improvement in NAS 5 (33.3%) 5 (27.8%) 1.000

Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) with P values from Wilcoxon's signed rank test or as n (%) with P values from Fisher's exact test.