Table 2. Population Benefits over 10 Years of Expanded HIV Testing/Treatment/Retention and Condom Use in the Community.
New HIV Acquired Infections | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Expanded Testing, Treatment, Retention plus Condom Use | N | Averted Cases | % Change | ||||||
60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | 60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | 60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | |
C (63%), J(0%), P(0%) | 8071 | 7939 | 7850 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
C (70%), J(0%), P(0%) | 6303 | 6214 | 6155 | 1768 | 1725 | 1695 | -21.91 | -21.72 | -21.59 |
C (75%), J(0%), P(0%) | 5133 | 5070 | 5028 | 2938 | 2869 | 2822 | -36.40 | -36.13 | -35.94 |
C (80%), J(0%), P(0%) | 4052 | 4010 | 3982 | 4019 | 3929 | 3868 | -49.80 | -49.49 | -49.27 |
C (85%), J(0%), P(0%) | 3063 | 3038 | 3021 | 5008 | 4901 | 4829 | -62.05 | -61.74 | -61.52 |
C (90%), J(0%), P(0%) | 2170 | 2156 | 2147 | 5901 | 5783 | 5703 | -73.12 | -72.84 | -72.65 |
HIV Prevalence | |||||||||
Expanded Testing, Treatment, Retention plus Condom Use | N | Averted Cases | % Change | ||||||
60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | 60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | 60/60/100 | 80/80/100 | 100/100/100 | |
C (63%), J(0%), P(0%) | 10062 | 9967 | 9901 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
C (70%), J(0%), P(0%) | 8594 | 8534 | 8493 | 1468 | 1433 | 1408 | -14.59 | -14.37 | -14.22 |
C (75%), J(0%), P(0%) | 7624 | 7585 | 7559 | 2438 | 2382 | 2343 | -24.23 | -23.90 | -23.66 |
C (80%), J(0%), P(0%) | 6728 | 6707 | 6692 | 3333 | 3260 | 3209 | -33.13 | -32.71 | -32.41 |
C (85%), J(0%), P(0%) | 5912 | 5903 | 5898 | 4150 | 4063 | 4003 | -41.24 | -40.77 | -40.43 |
C (90%), J(0%), P(0%) | 5176 | 5176 | 5177 | 4886 | 4790 | 4724 | -48.56 | -48.06 | -47.71 |
60/60/100, 80/80/100 and 100/100/100 represent rates (per 100 persons/6months) in the intervention scenarios for Testing/Treatment/Retention. Settings: C—Community, J—Jail and P—Prison. The interventions increased condom use only in the community from 63% to 90%, and maintained condom use in jail and prison at 0%.