Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123482

Table 3. Population Benefits over 10 Years of Expanded HIV Testing/Treatment/Retention and Condom Use in Jail.

New HIV Acquired Infections
Expanded Testing, Treatment, Retention plus Condom Use N Averted Cases % Change
60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100 60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100 60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100
C (63%), J(0%), P(0%) 64 63 62
C (63%), J(30%), P(0%) 46 45 44 18 18 18 -28.56 -28.87 -28.70
C (63%), J(60%), P(0%) 27 27 26 37 36 36 -57.27 -57.45 -57.35
C (63%), J(90%), P(0%) 9 9 9 55 54 53 -85.67 -85.73 -85.69
HIV Prevalence
Expanded Testing, Treatment, Retention plus Condom Use N Averted Cases % Change
60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100 60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100 60/60/100 80/80/100 100/100/100
C (63%), J(0%), P(0%) 64 63 62
C (63%), J(30%), P(0%) 63 63 62 0 0 0 -0.53 -0.52 -0.52
C (63%), J(60%), P(0%) 63 62 62 1 1 1 -1.05 -1.04 -1.04
C (63%), J(90%), P(0%) 63 62 62 1 1 1 -1.57 -1.55 -1.55

60/60/100, 80/80/100 and 100/100/100 represent rates (per 100 persons/6months) in the intervention scenarios for Testing/Treatment/Retention. Settings: C—Community, J—Jail and P—Prison. The interventions increased condom use only in jail from 0% to 90%, and maintained condom use in the community at 63% and in prison at 0%.