Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 14;180(2):218–226. doi: 10.1111/cei.12573

Table 4.

Diagnostic performance of specific aPL tests in the study cohort

Test % (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% CI)
Sensitivity Specificity Area under curve
LAC 81·8 (48·2–97·7) 97·9 (92·5–99·7) 0·898 (0·778–1·0) 204·8 (25·7–1632·7)
aCL IgG 27·3 (6·02–61·0) 97·9 (92·5–99·7) 0·626 (0·487–0·764) 17·1 (2·5–117·5)
aCL IgM 0·0 (0·0–32·1) 96·8 (90·2–99·2) 0·595 (0·417–0·773) 1·1 (0·1–23·2)*
2GPI IgG 27·3 (6·02–61·0) 98·9 (94·2–100·0) 0·679 (0·459–0·899) 34·5 (3·2–371·2)
2GPI IgM 0·0 (0·0–32·1) 98·9 (94·2–100·0) 0·653 (0·451–0·854) 2·7 (0·1–69·8)*
aPS/PT IgG 54·6 (23·4–83·3) 93·6 (86·5–97·6) 0·796 (0·624–0·968) 17·4 (4·1–73·9)
aPS/PT IgM 45·5 (16·8–76·6) 94·6 (87·9–98·2) 0·734 (0·516–0·951) 14·7 (3·3–65·1)
*

Logit correction since one of the values in the table was a zero. CI = confidence interval; aPL = anti-phospholipid; LAC = lupus anti-coagulant; aCL = anti-cardiolipin; GPI = glycoprotein I; aPS/PT = anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex; Ig = immunoglobulin.