Table 4.

Brain areas activated more by (a) vicarious reward than personal reward and (b) personal reward than vicarious reward in ALE contrast analyses

Region	Size	L/R	x	y	z
Vicarious Reward > Personal Reward
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex	536	L	−12	61	26
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex		L	−14	56	26
Middle temporal gyrus	672	L	−58	−20	−4
Posterior superior temporal sulcus		L	−60	−27	−1
Angular gyrus	128	L	−30	−60	40
Cerebellum	1832	L	−28	−90	−16
Cerebellum		L	−33	−89	−17
Cerebellum		L	−22	−90	−18
Fusiform gyrus		L	−24	−92	−11
Fusiform gyrus		L	−40	−84	−12
Fusiform gyrus		L	−30	−94	−12
Superior occipital gyrus	1096	R	32	−64	40
Middle occipital gyrus		R	32	−70	36
Middle occipital gyrus	256	R	39	−87	11
Middle occipital gyrus		R	34	−90	12
Personal Reward > Vicarious Reward
Nucleus accumbens	2712	R	15	17	−5
Nucleus accumbens		R	12	16	−14
Caudate		R	12	24	6
Caudate		R	16	19	8
Thalamus	7568	L	−6	−10	11
Thalamus		R	8	−10	12
Thalamus		R	14	−6	14
Nucleus accumbens		L	−9	5	1
Nucleus accumbens		L	−14	13	−7
Caudate		L	−6	10	18
Inferior frontal gyrus	264	R	38	24	−10

Notes. The input maps for the contrast analyses are described above for the single-study ALE meta-analyses and used a cluster-level threshold of p < 0.05 and a cluster-forming threshold of p < 0.01. In order to correct for multiple comparisons in the statistical difference map, we additionally used a conservative, whole-brain FDR correction of p < 0.01 (pID) and cluster extent of 128 mm³. Peaks are listed first for each cluster with subpeaks listed in subsequent rows.