Table 3.
Study | Size | Recall | Precision | F-score |
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Leaman et al. [17]* | 3,150 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
Nikfarjam and Gonzalez* [34] | 1,200 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
Hadzi-puric and Grmusa [43] | 990 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 0.70 |
Liu and Chen [46] | 200 | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.84 |
Yates and Goharian [50] | 125 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
Freifeld et al. [57] | 437 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.78 |
Segura-Bedmar et al. [58] | 400 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.68 |
O'Connor et al. [35] | 1,873 | 0.62 | 0.54 | 0.58 |
Sampathkumar et al. [62] | 2,000 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
Nikfarjam et al. (DailyStrength) [65] | 1,559 | 0.78 | 0.86 | 0.82 |
Nikfarjam et al. (Twitter) [65] | 444 | 0368 | 0.77 | 0.72 |
indicates systems using the same (or subsets of the same) data set.