Table 6.

Results of binary logistic regressions predicting the classification of our participants to the dyslexic and control groups

		Predicted
		Written learning				Phonological factor				H&J sequential
		N 1	N 2	Total %	p	N 1	N 2	Total %	p	N 1	N 2	Total %	p
Observed	Controls 1	29	11	72.5		29	11	72.5		28	12	70.0
Observed	Dyslexics 2	10	34	77.3		13	31	70.5		16	28	63.6
	Total			75.0				71.4				66.7
	Wald			2.5	<.001			17.4	<.001			12.6	<.001
		Written learning + phonological factor				Phonological factor + H&J sequential				Written learning + H&J sequential
		N 1	N 2	Total %	p	N 1	N 2	Total %	p	N 1	N 2	Total %	p
Observed	Controls 1	33	7	82.5		29	11	72.5		28	12	70
Observed	Dyslexics 2	7	37	84.1		9	35	79.5		10	34	77.3
	Total			83.3				76.2				73.8
	Wald writt. learning			11.2	.001			—	—			13.8	<.001
	Wald phon. factor			8.4	.004			12.3	<.001			—	—
	Wald H&J sequential			—	—			3.4	.07			.9	.33

Note: Number predicted in the different groups and overall proportions of correct predictions for the different tasks. H&J = Hindi and Japanese; writt. = written; phon. = phonological. Correlations which remain significant after Bonferroni correction are in bold.