Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;25(2):191–199. doi: 10.1111/jon.12194

Table 2.

Errors in Global Normalized Brain Volumes per Subject due to Segmentation Misclassifications in the MS Group

Segmentation % Difference % Difference
Outputs Compared (Mean) (SD)
cGMF-uGMF 1.04 .33
cGMF-c1GMF −.28 .26
cGMF-c2GMF 1.31 .27
uGMF-c1GMF −1.33 .27
uGMF-c2GMF .28 .26
cWMF-uWMF −1.67 .58
cWMF-c1WMF 0.53 .52
cWMF-c2WMF −2.20 .42
uWMF-c1WMF 2.16 .41
uWMF-c2WMF −0.53 .52
cBPF-uBPF .026 .04
cBPF-c1BPF .025 .04
cBPF-c2BPF .0006 .002
uBPF-c1BPF −.0007 .002
uBPF-c2BPF −.025 .04

Examples of differences between segmentation output types; uncorrected (u, raw); correction of misclassifications related to either deep gray matter contouring (c1), T1 hypointensities (c2), or both (c, dually corrected).

GMF = gray matter fraction; WMF = white matter fraction; BPF = brain parenchymal fraction.

Percent differences were calculated using the intrasubject differences between the 2 values divided by that subject's first value listed in each row (eg, cGMF - uGMF = [(cGMF - uGMF)/cGMF)]*100%).