Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2015 Apr 24;9(4):e0003740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003740

Bayesian Geostatistical Model-Based Estimates of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection in Nigeria, Including Annual Deworming Requirements

Akinola S Oluwole 1, Uwem F Ekpo 1,*, Dimitrios-Alexios Karagiannis-Voules 2,3, Eniola M Abe 1,4, Francisca O Olamiju 5, Sunday Isiyaku 6, Chukwu Okoronkwo 7, Yisa Saka 7, Obiageli J Nebe 7, Eka I Braide 4, Chiedu F Mafiana 8, Jürg Utzinger 2,3, Penelope Vounatsou 2,3
Editor: Claudia Munoz-Zanzi9
PMCID: PMC4409219  PMID: 25909633

Abstract

Background

The acceleration of the control of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections in Nigeria, emphasizing preventive chemotherapy, has become imperative in light of the global fight against neglected tropical diseases. Predictive risk maps are an important tool to guide and support control activities.

Methodology

STH infection prevalence data were obtained from surveys carried out in 2011 using standard protocols. Data were geo-referenced and collated in a nationwide, geographic information system database. Bayesian geostatistical models with remotely sensed environmental covariates and variable selection procedures were utilized to predict the spatial distribution of STH infections in Nigeria.

Principal Findings

We found that hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Trichuris trichiura infections are endemic in 482 (86.8%), 305 (55.0%), and 55 (9.9%) locations, respectively. Hookworm and A. lumbricoides infection co-exist in 16 states, while the three species are co-endemic in 12 states. Overall, STHs are endemic in 20 of the 36 states of Nigeria, including the Federal Capital Territory of Abuja. The observed prevalence at endemic locations ranged from 1.7% to 51.7% for hookworm, from 1.6% to 77.8% for A. lumbricoides, and from 1.0% to 25.5% for T. trichiura. Model-based predictions ranged from 0.7% to 51.0% for hookworm, from 0.1% to 82.6% for A. lumbricoides, and from 0.0% to 18.5% for T. trichiura. Our models suggest that day land surface temperature and dense vegetation are important predictors of the spatial distribution of STH infection in Nigeria. In 2011, a total of 5.7 million (13.8%) school-aged children were predicted to be infected with STHs in Nigeria. Mass treatment at the local government area level for annual or bi-annual treatment of the school-aged population in Nigeria in 2011, based on World Health Organization prevalence thresholds, were estimated at 10.2 million tablets.

Conclusions/Significance

The predictive risk maps and estimated deworming needs presented here will be helpful for escalating the control and spatial targeting of interventions against STH infections in Nigeria.

Author Summary

Infections with three kinds of parasitic worms—hookworm, roundworm, and whipworm—are collectively known as soil-transmitted helminths (STHs). These parasitic worm infections are widespread in Nigeria, but the exact distribution is poorly understood. In view of the global commitment to control STH infections, there is a need to accelerate the mapping of STH infections to guide control interventions, such as large-scale administration of deworming drugs. In this study, we collated survey data from the year 2011 for Nigeria. The data were utilized to predict the distribution of STH infection based on environmental and socioeconomic covariates, and employing a Bayesian geostatistical modeling approach. Our results indicated that STH infections are widely distributed across Nigeria with prevalence estimates as high as 83% for roundworm, 50% for hookworm, and 19% for whipworm infections at specific survey locations. We predict that 5.7 million school-aged children were infected with STHs. The numbers of deworming tablets for annual or bi-annual treatment of the school-aged population at local government areas level in Nigeria for 2011 were estimated to be 10.2 million.

Introduction

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections belong to the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). In terms of at-risk population and number of people infected, the STHs are the most frequent NTDs worldwide. The three common STHs are the roundworm (Ascaris lumbricoides), the whipworm (Trichuris trichiura), and the hookworms (Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus) [13]. The most recent estimates suggest that 819 million people worldwide are infected with A. lumbricoides, 465 million with T. trichiura, and 439 million with hookworm [4]. STH infections thrive where there are poor hygiene practices, including limited environmental sanitation, unsafe water sources, inadequate toilet facilities, and poor fecal disposal methods, coupled with poverty and low household income [57]. School-aged children (5–14 years), in particular, are at high risk of infection and morbidity due to STHs, and hence, are the main target of preventive chemotherapy [8,9].

Nigeria has the highest total number of people infected with STHs in sub-Saharan Africa [1012]. However, there is a paucity of empirical data on the spatial distribution of STH infections and this has hindered control. The planning, implementation, and rigorous monitoring of a national control program targeting STH infection can be enhanced with detailed knowledge of the spatial and temporal distribution of infection and morbidity [13]. In light of the global commitment to escalate the control of NTDs [1417], knowledge of the spatial distribution of STH infections is a necessary prerequisite for the implementation of control and elimination measures, such as large-scale administration of anthelmintic drugs.

Thus far, two NTD-specific risk maps have been published for Nigeria; onchocerciasis [18] and schistosomiasis [19]. As the country prepares to implement large-scale preventive chemotherapy campaigns against STH infection, a nationwide map of the spatial distribution of STH using available survey data can help in advocacy, resource sourcing for funds, and implementation of control/elimination activities. The purpose of the current study was to produce high-resolution STH infection risk maps, including estimated number of school-aged children infected with A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworm in Nigeria. We used recently obtained survey data and employed Bayesian geostatistical models to predict STH infection risk across Nigeria. Additionally, we computed annualized treatment requirements with the anthelmintic drugs albendazole and mebendazole. An important aspect of this study is to provide STH program managers with information for effective implementation of STH control activities.

Methods

Ethics Statement

The work presented here is derived from an in-depth analysis of STH infection survey data obtained from the Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) of Nigeria in 2011. Ethical clearance, informed consent procedures, and treatment were according to FMoH guidelines and recommendations. The data are aggregated and do not contain identifiable individual or household level information. Thus, no specific ethical approval was required for the secondary analysis presented here.

STH Infection Data

In 2011, a national survey was carried out in Nigeria, pertaining to STH infection among children aged 5–14 years. The overreaching goal of the survey was to prepare the country for mass drug administration with albendazole or mebendazole, provide evidence-based data for advocacy, funding, and support of preventive chemotherapy. The survey was conducted by FMoH, in collaboration with State Ministries of Health and non-governmental organizations using trained field workers. The survey used standard protocols put forth by the World Health Organization (WHO) for rapid mapping of STH infection in schools, collection of stool samples, and laboratory work-up. The diagnostic method used was the Kato-Katz technique, with duplicate Kato-Katz thick smears prepared from fresh stool samples; one per participant [20]. In each community/school, 60 school-aged children were examined. Data were collected at 555 locations across Nigeria, with the exception of areas in the north-eastern part of the country, where the state of security at the time of the survey did not allow doing so. Study locations were geo-referenced, using a hand-held global positioning system (GPS) device (Garmin Etex; Garmin Corp, Kansas, United States of America). Quality checks were performed to authenticate that the coordinates indeed corresponded to specific locations using readily available Google Map and Google Earth tools.

Environmental Data

Environmental data were obtained from open-access remote sensing data sources, as detailed in Table 1. These include normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as vegetation proxy, day and night land surface temperature (LST), altitude, soil acidity, and soil moisture. Environmental data were processed as described elsewhere [21]. Annual averages for the year 2011 were calculated and used in all subsequent analyses. Maps showing the variation of the covariates across the country are shown in the Supporting Information (S2 Fig).

Table 1. Sources of environmental and socioeconomic data used to model soil-transmitted helminth infection risk in Nigeria.

Data type Source Date Temporal resolution Spatial resolution
Altitude SRTM 1 2011 1 km
Rainfall FEWS NET2 2011 Yearly 1 km
Normalized difference vegetation index MODIS/Terra 3 2009–2011 16 days 1 km
Day land surface temperature MODIS/Terra 3 2009–2011 8 days 1 km
Night land surface temperature MODIS/Terra 3 2009–2011 8 days 1 km
Soil pH/soil moisture ISRIC-WISE 4 10 km
Population density Afripop 5 2010 1 km
Urban-rural classification SEDAC 6 1 km

1 Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM); http://www.worldclim.org/ (accessed on 20 July 2014).

2 Famine Early Warning System (FEWS) Network; http://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/index.php/ (accessed on 20 July 2014).

3 Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 20 July 2014).

4 Global soil profile data ISRIC-WISE database v.1.2; http://www.isric.org/ (accessed on 20 July 2014).

5 World Population database; http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/atatem/index_files/Nigeria.htm (accessed on 20 July 2014).

6 Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center; http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/dataset/grump-v1-urban-extents (accessed on 20 July 2014).

Socioeconomic and Population Data

Data on rural and urban extents for Nigeria were downloaded from the Center for International Earth Science Information Network [22]. Population data for 2010, at 100 x 100 m spatial resolution, was downloaded from the Afripop population database hosted by the World Population. The data were adjusted to 2011 by multiplying each pixel value with the Nigerian annual growth rate of 2.8% (http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.GROW). The total population for 2011 was 154,731,365 of which 26.8% correspond to school-aged children (http://www.census.gov/population/international/data/idb/region.php).

Statistical Analysis

We applied Bayesian binomial geostatistical models to relate STH infection risk with environmental and socioeconomic predictors. We used integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA) [23] and a stochastic partial differential equations approach [24] for fast approximate Bayesian inference. Analysis was carried out in R [25] and the INLA package (www.r-inla.org). Details of how models were implemented are provided in Supporting Information (S1 Text) [24,26,27].

We followed an approach detailed by Karagiannis-Voules et al. [28], which has also been used for STH geostatistical modeling in Cambodia [29], to select the best predictive model. In brief, we fitted Bayesian bivariate geostatistical models to select the functional form of the effect of each predictor based on the cross-validated logarithmic score [30,31]. We considered linear and categorical functional forms of effects. The categorical functional form of the covariates was generated using 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile to group each covariate into specific categories. Non-linearity was addressed through random walk processes of order 1 and 2 [32]. The form of each predictor giving the lowest mean logarithmic score was chosen. To identify the set of the most important predictors, we fitted geostatistical models with all possible combination of covariates (i.e., 256 models for each STH species-specific infection) and selected the one, for each of the three STH species, with the best logarithmic score. The final models were used to predict infection risk at a grid of 3 x 3 km including areas where infection data were not available. The form of the covariate that was included in the final model used in the prediction of each species of STH is shown in Table 2. The posterior estimates and Bayesian credible intervals for the effects of the predictors are presented in odds ratios. Additional details are provided in Supporting Information (S1 Text).

Table 2. Posterior estimates (median; 95% Bayesian credible interval) of the final geostatistical models for soil-transmitted helminth infections in Nigeria in 2011.

Species Predictor variable Median (95% Bayesian credible interval)
Ascaris lumbricoides NDVI 2011 1.29 (1.00, 1.66)
Altitude (m)
<186 1.00
186–305 0.71 (0.40, 1.25)
≥305 1.50 (0.79, 2.77)
LST day 2011 (°C)
<29.5 1.00
29.5–34.0 0.56 (0.36, 0.87)
≥34.0 0.13 (0.06, 0.27)
Hookworm Rural 1.00
Urban 0.79 (0.63, 1.00)
NDVI 2011
<0.28 1.00
0.28–0.40 1.02 (0.84, 1.23)
0.40–0.48 1.30 (1.00, 1.68)
≥0.48 1.67 (1.25, 2.22)
LST day 2011 (°C)
<29.5 1.00
29.5–34.0 0.77 (0.59, 1.01)
≥ 34.0 0.88 (0.60, 1.28)
Trichuris trichiura * Altitude (m)
<420.5 1.00
420.5–835 0.11 (0.03, 0.33)
835–1,249 0.65 (0.26, 1.64)
≥1,249 0.30 (0.10, 0.93)

*The effect of land surface temperature (LST) at night is depicted in S1 Fig.

Due to the large number of observed zero prevalence data, we additionally fitted zero-inflated binomial models with invariant probability of zero-inflation. These models have shown better predictive ability in geostatistical modeling of malaria. [33]. In the present study, the zero-inflated models did not improve predictions (based on the cross-validated logarithmic score). Hence, we report results from the binomial models.

Determination of School-Aged Population at Risk of STH

The school-aged population infected with STHs was estimated by combining the predictive posterior distribution of the infection prevalence at the pixel level with the school-aged population size at each pixel. The number of infected school-aged children was calculated by summing the respective values for each pixel, as described by Schur et al. [34].

Estimation of Anthelmintic Treatment Needs

The amount of anthelmintic treatment (i.e., albendazole or mebendazole) that would be required to treat infected school-aged children at the unit of the state in Nigeria was computed from the pixel level risk estimates. Following recommendations by WHO, school-aged children should be treated twice a year in areas where the infection prevalence is ≥50%, while annual treatment is recommended in areas where infection prevalence ranges between 20% and 50% [9]. Hence, we computed the total number of anthelmintic drugs needed by multiplying the number of school-aged children, per pixel, by a factor of 2 (prevalence ≥50%, biannual treatment) or 1 (prevalence 20–50%, annual treatment). We considered the estimated prevalence of STH at pixel-level, calculated under the assumption that the species-specific prevalences are independent. Treatments were aggregated over all pixels within individual states [19,33]. We compared treatment needs calculated from both pixel and population-adjusted district level prevalences. The estimation of the country-wide number of treatments was based on the sum of the treatment distributions of all local government areas (LGAs) and was conducted using both the approaches described above.

Results

Spatial Distribution of STH Infections in Nigeria

STH infections were diagnosed in the stool of school-aged children surveyed in 20 of the 36 states, including the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. A. lumbricoides was present in 305 (55.0%) locations in 16 states, and prevalence at the unit of the state varied from 1.6% to 77.8% (Fig 1A). Hookworm infection showed the widest geographic distribution, as it was found in 482 (86.8%) locations in all 20 states, with prevalence at the unit of the state ranging from 1.7% to 51.7% denoted with the varying colours in Fig 1B. T. trichiura was found in 55 (9.9%) locations in 12 states with state-prevalence ranging from 1.0% to 25.5% (Fig 1C). A. lumbricoides and hookworm HHhHhinfections were co-endemic in 16 states, while co-occurrence of all three STH species was observed in 12 states.

Fig 1. Spatial distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Nigeria.

Fig 1

A) Observed prevalence of A. lumbricoides. B) Observed prevalence of hookworm. C) Observed prevalence of T. trichiura. D) Predicted prevalence of A. lumbricoides. E) Predicted prevalence of hookworm. F) Predicted prevalence of T. trichiura.

Predicted Risk of A. lumbricoides

Areas with high infection risk (≥50%) of A. lumbricoides were predicted for the south-western part of Nigeria. For most areas in the northern and southern parts of Nigeria, the predicted prevalence was below 5% (Fig 1D). Predicted pixel level prevalence revealed that high risks areas for A. lumbricoides infection occur within the states of Ogun, Ondo, Kwara, and Kogi, and some areas in Anambra and Taraba states. Our Bayesian geostatistical model for A. lumbricoides risk suggests that extreme high LST (≥34°C) is negatively associated with A. lumbricoides, while a positive association was found between A. lumbricoides infection and high NDVI value (Table 2).

Predicted Risk of Hookworm

It was observed that most south-eastern, western, and middle belt parts of Nigeria fell either in the high-risk (≥50% pixel level prevalence) or moderate-risk areas (20–50% pixel level prevalence) of hookworm infection (Fig 1E). The predicted pixel level risk of hookworm in the northern states of Nigeria ranged from 5% to 10% (Fig 1E). However, there are some high-risk (≥50% pixel level prevalence) communities in the states of Katsina, Zamfara, and Sokoto in the north-western part of the country. Only few areas in Nigeria showed a pixel level predicted prevalence of hookworm below 5%. Areas with predicted hookworm pixel level prevalence greater than ≥50%, which are considered as high-risk areas, were observed in the states of Taraba, Benue, Oyo, Kwara, Katsina, Zamfara, Sokoto, and Kebbi (Fig 1E). The risk of hookworm infection at pixel level in Jigawa, Ogun, Osun, and parts of Zamfara and Sokoto states were predicted to be below 5%. Our Bayesian-based geostatistical model for hookworm showed that high NDVI values and low day LST values are positively associated with hookworm infection (Table 2). The prevalence of hookworm infection was lower in urban compared to rural areas (Table 2).

Predicted Risk of T. trichiura

Infection risk of T. trichiura, ranging between 10% and 20% (pixel level prevalence), was predicted for areas in the south-west (Ondo state), while all other parts of the country showed pixel level prevalence risks below 10%. The predicted risk of T. trichiura was considerably higher in the southern part of Nigeria compared to the north (Fig 1F). Pixel level prevalence revealed that areas within Ogun, Ondo, Anambra, and Enugu states and some areas of Taraba state are at high risk of T. trichiura. Our Bayesian geostatistical model for T. trichiura suggests a random walk process for night LST, indicating that extreme high temperatures (≥34°C) are associated with the absence of T. trichiura in Nigeria. A negative association was found between altitude (increase in altitude) and risk of T. trichiura infection.

School-Aged Population at Risk of STHs and Treatment Requirements

Out of the 41.5 million school-aged children in Nigeria, an estimated 5.7million are predicted to be infected with any STH, an overall predicted prevalence of 13.8%. Kano state has the highest number of infected school-aged children, while the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja has the lowest prevalence (Table 3).

Table 3. Median predicted prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infection; number of school-aged children infected for Nigeria, stratified by state for 2011.

Population-adjusted mean prevalence and 95% Bayesian credible interval
S/N State Ascaris lumbricoides (95% CI) Trichuris trichiura (95% CI) Hookworm (95% CI) Any STH** School-aged children population infected
1 Abia 7.8 (2.8, 19.7) 0.3 (0.1, 0.7) 9.3 (3.5, 20.3) 16.8 (8.3, 30.0) 144,950
2 Adamawa 2.8 (1.6, 4.2) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 8.5 (5.1, 13.4) 11.2 (7.6, 16.9) 92,727
3 Akwa Ibom 8.3 (3.1, 19.4) 0.4 (0.1, 1) 9.5 (3.2, 23.4) 18.4 (8.9, 31.3) 199,303
4 Anambra 3.9 (2.7, 6.2) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 6.3 (5.5, 7.5) 10.2 (8.5, 12.9) 126,859
5 Bauchi 3.6 (2.2, 5.9) 0.1 (0.04, 0.2) 7.3 (4.5, 10.1) 10.7 (7.6, 14.3) 145,923
6 Bayelsa 8.0 (4.0, 17.6) 0.3 (0.1, 0.9) 11.2 (4.3, 24.0) 19.2 (11.4, 32.7) 83,072
7 Benue 5.2 (3.7, 7.7) 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) 14.8 (12.4, 18.2) 19.7 (16.7, 23.6) 247,591
8 Borno 1.8 (0.9, 4.3) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 7.2 (4.5, 12.2) 9.2 (6.46, 13.4) 108,514
9 Cross River 8.9 (5.1, 14.0) 0.3 (0.1, 0.7) 12.0 (7.4, 18.9) 20.4 (13.8, 28.3) 155,420
10 Delta 7.7 (3.9, 14.4) 0.3 (0.1, 0.8) 10.8 (5.4, 19.6) 18.1 (12.0, 27.3) 211,644
11 Ebonyi 7.6 (3.7, 15.5) 0.3 (0.1, 0.8) 7.8 (4.3, 13.9) 15.5 (9.6, 22.8) 94,252
12 Edo 7.6 (4.1, 15.2) 0.2 (0.1, 0.8) 10.2 (6.3, 17.4) 17.9 (11.9, 27.6) 175,147
13 Ekiti 10.4 (3.9,21.7) 0.1 (0.02, 0.2) 7.6 (3.8, 14.3) 17.8 (10.3, 28.9) 120,899
14 Enugu 6.4 (3.5, 14.2) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 7.9 (6.1, 10.1) 14.2 (10.4, 21.8) 135,568
15 Federal Capital Territory 4.2 (2.5, 7.6) 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) 7.5 (5.8, 9.6) 11.6 (9.2, 15.3) 43,500
16 Gombe 2.2 (1.1, 4.5) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 7.0 (4.3, 13.9) 9.4 (6.3, 15.8) 67,031
17 Imo 6.3 (2.5, 16.3) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) 12.3 (5.2, 23.8) 18.5 (10.6, 29.9) 210,835
18 Jigawa 3.4 (1.7, 5.2) 0.1 (0.02, 0.2) 5.0 (3.3, 7.1) 8.1 (5.9, 11.3) 105,754
19 Kaduna 7.2 (4.4, 11.5) 0.04 (0.02, 0.2) 7.5 (4.8, 12.1) 14.8 (10.7, 19.7) 265,200
20 Kano 5.0 (2.5, 12.3) 0.1 (0.01, 0.3) 5.8 (3.0, 14.6) 11.6 (6.4, 20.3) 322,757
21 Katsina 4.2 (2.4, 7.7) 0.04 (0.01, 0.2) 7.1 (4.2, 10.8) 11.0 (7.4, 16.6) 185,648
22 Kebbi 1.9 (1, 3.2) 0.1 (0.04, 0.1) 7.8 (4.7, 11.9) 9.9 (6.6, 14.0) 95,208
23 Kogi 8.2 (4.7, 12.7) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 10.6 (6.7, 16.6) 18.1 (13.4, 25.1) 178,799
24 Kwara 20.9 (17.1, 24.7) 0.2 (0.1, 0.6) 7.7 (6.7, 8.9) 27.3 (23.6, 30.8) 199,369
25 Lagos 5.9 (1.4, 27.0) 0.2 (0.1, 2.1) 3.1 (1.1, 9.7) 10.4 (4.4, 28.4) 291,630
26 Nassarawa 5.7 (3.5, 9.7) 0.14 (0.1, 0.3) 8.6 (5.0, 14.4) 14.2 (9.6, 20.3) 79,619
27 Niger 4.6 (3.2, 7.4) 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) 7.8 (5.4, 10.4) 12.5 (9.4, 16.2) 142,791
28 Ogun 11.8 (7.4, 17.3) 0.4 (0.2, 1.0) 5.1 (3, 8.5) 16.8 (11.9, 22.2) 173,848
29 Ondo 13.5 (9.7, 18.0) 0.6 (0.4, 1.2) 11.6 (8.4, 17.0) 23.9 (18.6, 29.6) 219,037
30 Osun 8.5 (3.7, 15.8) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 4.5 (2.2, 9.3) 12.8 (7.9, 20.1) 143,953
31 Oyo 6.5 (3.6, 13.5) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 7.7 (4.8, 13.5) 14.0 (9.4, 21.6) 236,550
32 Plateau 5.9 (3.2, 11.9) 0.1 (0.03, 0.4) 7.8 (4.3, 12.7) 14.0 (8.9, 19.4) 131,414
33 Rivers 7.9 (2.9, 19.8) 0.3 (0.1, 1.1) 10.0 (4.3, 20.9) 18.3 (9.5, 31.6) 221,281
34 Sokoto 1.4 (0.9, 2.0) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 6.8 (6.0, 7.9) 8.3 (7.5, 9.7) 88,095
35 Taraba 6.1 (4.6, 7.9) 0.1 (0.1, 0.3) 14.1 (11.3, 16.8) 19.6 (16.4, 22.3) 132,344
36 Yobe 2.0 (0.9, 3.9) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 6.6 (3.9, 11) 8.7 (6.1, 12.9) 59,787
37 Zamfara 3.3 (2.3, 4.9) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 7.3 (5.8, 9.2) 10.5 (8.9, 12.5) 100,545
Total/Mean 6.2 (3.3, 12.5) 0.17 (0.08,0.55) 7.9 (4.8, 13.5) 13.8 (10.5, 16.5) 5,736,864

**Calculated under the assumption of independence.

Following WHO recommended cut-offs of 20% and 50% for annual and bi-annual preventive chemotherapy with either albendazole or mebendazole, the estimates aggregated at state level showed that only 3 out of the 37 states had a population-adjusted prevalence between 20% and 50%. These states are Cross River, Kwara, and Ondo (Table 3). The LGA is the third administrative level in Nigeria and the preferred unit for health intervention. According to the aforementioned prevalence cut-offs, we computed that the number of albendazole or mebendazole tablets needed for treatments using pixel-level prevalence is 10,222,409, tablets, whereas using population-adjusted LGA-level prevalence, it is 9,025,229 tablets. These numbers correspond to the median of the country-wide distributions of treatment needs rather than the sum of the median LGA predicted requirements (S1 Table).

Discussion

We provide spatially explicit model-based risk estimates of the three main species of STHs in Nigeria. We used Bayesian geostatistical methods which have become essential tools in infectious disease risk profiling [35]. Our estimates are based on a large ensemble of recent survey data that were obtained using standard protocols. Hence, our estimates are more robust than those obtained from previous mapping exercises that collated historic survey data employing different collection methods and diagnostic approaches [28,36,37]. Our predictive risk maps are important and useful for planning, implementation, and evaluation of STH control programs [21]. Indeed, as a first step, the maps will help prioritize the implementation of intervention programs for the control of STH infections, particularly the spatial targeting of preventive chemotherapy. This is important in light of the current global moves toward control and elimination of NTDs [14,38]. Additionally, the model-based risk map of STH presented here complements a recent model-based risk map of schistosomiasis in Nigeria [19] for concurrent control of STH and schistosomiasis [39,40]. An integrated approach for the control of multiple helminthiases would reduce operational costs in the planning and implementation of control programs, as the primary target risk group for preventive chemotherapy are school-aged children, and hence the education system is the most convenient platform for drug administration [38,41,42]. It should be noted, however, that recent mathematical modeling work revealed that adults should also be targeted by preventive chemotherapy if substantial gains of morbidity control and interruption of transmission are aimed for [43]. A similar result was supported by a sub-continental geostatistical analysis of STH in sub-Saharan Africa [28].

Our predictions show that most areas in Nigeria are characterized by STH infection prevalence below 20%. This estimate is in line with the distribution pattern of STH infections in most endemic populations. Infections are usually aggregated where most infected individuals in a community will have infections of light or moderate intensity, while a few will be heavily infected [44]. The heavily infected individuals are at highest risk of clinical consequences of STH infection and serve as the reservoir host for the continuous transmission to the rest of the community [41]. Although WHO does not recommend large-scale preventive chemotherapy in areas where prevalence is below 20% [9], detailed information of the number of infected individuals for lower risk areas is important from operational and programmatic points of view [45]. The overall relatively low prevalence of STH infection across Nigeria could be due to the periodic deworming of school-aged children by health officials and non-governmental health organizations working in the country. Currently ongoing in Nigeria are deworming programs targeting onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis, which include ivermectin treatment given to school-aged children 5 years and above for onchocerciasis and/or ivermectin plus albendazole against lymphatic filariasis. Another reason may be attributed to good access to cheap sachet drinking water popularly called “pure water” in many rural communities in Nigeria. This 500 ml nylon-bagged potable water is basically available everywhere in Nigeria and is sold at US$ 0.03 per sachet. The availability of this product may be a factor in reducing the fecal-oral transmission of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura. On the other hand, the comparatively higher prevalence and distribution of hookworm infection in Nigeria is associated with the transmission of this parasite through the skin. Hence, barefoot walking by school-aged children is a risk factor and is likely to be driven by low socioeconomic status [44]. It should also be noted that Nigeria in the equatorial zone is suitable for hookworm larval development [46].

Our predictions revealed that less than 15% of school-aged children were infected with STHs in 2011. Thus, the acceleration of STH control is important to maintain this relatively low level of prevalence in the most populous country in Africa [47]. Our data are useful in reviewing the current STH control program in Nigeria in light of the findings presented here. Based on our predictions, the estimated annualized needs for anthelmintic drugs have been determined to be 10.2 million tablets. This amount should be further reviewed when the security issue in north-eastern Nigeria is resolved and prevalence data for this region become available to update model-based estimates. The fact that infection prevalence of STHs are considerably lower when compared to past estimates and projections [11] points to progress made, thanks to efforts by various governmental and non-governmental health development agencies implementing deworming programs across the country. Hence, these efforts should be sustained with adequate funding [12].

We fitted Bayesian geostatistical models to identify environmental and socioeconomic predictors that influence the distribution of each of the three STH species. Our results show that NDVI is a major environmental predictor for hookworm infection, while day LST is negatively associated with the distribution of A. lumbricoides. The results of our predictions are supported by the biology, ecology, and epidemiology of STHs. In fact, low humidity, associated with high temperature, leads to cessation of embryonation of A. lumbricoides, while high humidity promotes quick embryonation of A. lumbricoides eggs [48,49]. Our results are in line with earlier reports on the influence of temperature in the distribution and transmission of STH infections in Bolivia and the People’s Republic of China [37,50]. The observed prevalence data show that hookworm infection is the most widespread of the three common STH infections and has a higher predicted prevalence than the other two species. This finding is setting-dependent since other studies carried out in Bolivia, the People’s Republic of China, and Kenya found that A. lumbricoides is the predominant STH species [37,50,51].

The only socioeconomic predictor used (i.e., urban-rural classification) did not show any relationship with A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura infections. Other socioeconomic proxies, such as sanitation level and access to clean water, may be able to better explain the spatial distribution of infection risk with STHs [52]. However, unless individual information on both infection and, for instance, sanitation become available, such socioeconomic proxies might not improve predictions [29]. The predictors identified indicate that high night LST, which is often observed in the desert part of Nigeria as well as high altitude, can prohibit the survival of T. trichiura. This result may explain the quasi-absence of this STH species in the northern part of Nigeria (where there is extreme heat and a short wet season).

The strength of this study is that our analysis is based on recent survey data obtained by the FMoH Nigeria in 2011, adhering to standard and uniform diagnostic methods, focussing on school-aged children across all surveyed locations. This helps to avoid prediction bias associated with heterogeneities (e.g., due to diagnostic error and different age groups across surveys) arising from historically compiled data [52]. More importantly, an accurate and up-to-date map of STH infections is more reliable in making decisions for helminthiasis control, as relying on historic data alone may not give a true picture of the current status of the disease [53]. A limitation of this analysis is the lack of data from most of the north-eastern part of the country due to security issues and therefore prediction uncertainties are high in that part of the country.

There are two important points to consider in the calculation of treatments as well as number of people infected that are offered for discussion. First, the geographic level (such as district, state, and country) of aggregating pixel-level predictions has an impact on the overall result, as discussed by Schur et al. [34]. The treatments over an administrative area can be calculated using either pixel-level prevalence estimates (aggregated over the area) or population-adjusted prevalence over the area. In the present study we compared treatment needs calculated from both approaches using LGA as the level of aggregation. The total number of treatments for the whole country differs by 1,197,180 tablets between the two approaches. The main reason of this difference is that population-adjustment over an area (e.g., LGA) might be dominated by largely populated pixels that usually correspond to urban settlements. Second, the pixel resolution affects the number of estimated treatments. Low resolution would lead to few pixels covering large surfaces and crossing boundaries of administrative levels. Therefore, calculations do not take into account the variation in the population density and can wrongly assign treatments to areas.

Our estimates are lower than those recently reported in a geostatistical analysis of STH infection across sub-Saharan Africa [28]. The previous analysis used historic data over the past 50 years stemming from 33 states in Nigeria, some of which had high prevalence before 2000. It also considered a common temporal trend across all countries and showed a prevalence decrease after 2000, probably due to socioeconomic development as well as preventive chemotherapy that have been scaled up recently. In Nigeria, according to the preventive chemotherapy database of WHO, from 2003 to 2010, there have been more than 10 million school-aged children and almost 7 million preschool-aged children treated for STHs. From 2010 onwards, more than 22 million school-aged children have received preventive chemotherapy. In our study, using recent survey data, we predicted lower prevalence, indicating a continuous decline in the prevalence of STH.

In conclusion, we have produced spatially explicit model-based risk estimates of the geographic distribution of the three main species of STHs in Nigeria and determined underlying environmental risk factors. This is useful for planning the control of STH. We have further estimated the number school-aged children infected and at risk of infection, and provided annualized deworming requirement for Nigeria. With these data, the national STH control program can mobilize resources and attract local, national, and international support to escalate the implementation of preventive chemotherapy and other control measures nationwide.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. The effect of land surface temperature (LST) at night.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Maps of environmental co-variates used in the model.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Population-adjusted and Pixel treatment requirement per local government areas (LGAs) in Nigeria.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Details of analysis conducted.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Federal Ministry of Health (Abuja, Nigeria) for providing the survey data used in the analysis and the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Basel, Switzerland) for providing an enabling environment for the analysis to be conducted.

Data Availability

All disease data are available from the http://www.gntd.org/ database after registration, and from the Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria: Contact Dr Obiageli Nebe (nebeoj@yahoo.com).

Funding Statement

Financial support for data collection and analysis of this work was provided by European Foundation Initiative for African Research into Neglected Tropical Diseases (EFINTD), provided to UFE, ASO and EMA (grant no: AZ:86 527). DAKV was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (http://www.snf.ch; project no. PDFMP3-137156) and ASO was funded through EFINTD grant no: AZ:86527. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, et al. (2006) Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet 367:1521–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hotez PJ, Brindley PJ, Bethony JM, King CH, Pearce EJ, et al. (2008) Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest 118:1311–1321. 10.1172/JCI34261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Utzinger J, Becker SL, Knopp S, Blum J, Neumayr AL, et al. (2012) Neglected tropical diseases: diagnosis, clinical management, treatment and control. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13727 10.4414/smw.2012.13727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ (2014) Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors 7:37 10.1186/1756-3305-7-37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.UNICEF (2008) Nigeria. Water and sanitation summary sheet. http://www.unicef.org/nigeria/ng_media_Water_sanitation_summary_sheet.pdf; accessed on 20 July 2014.
  • 6. Ekpo UF, Odoemene SN, Mafiana CF, Sam-Wobo SO (2008) Helminthiasis and hygiene conditions of schools in Ikenne, Ogun State, Nigeria. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2:e146 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Strunz EC, Addiss DG, Stocks ME, Ogden S, Utzinger J, et al. (2014) Water, sanitation, hygiene, and soil-transmitted helminth infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 11:e1001620 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. WHO (2002) Prevention and control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis: a report of WHO expert committee. WHO Tech Rep Ser 912: 1–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. WHO (2006) Preventive chemotherapy in human helminthiasis: coordinated use of anthelminthic drugs in control interventions: a manual for health professionals and programme managers. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Hotez PJ, Kamath A (2009) Neglected tropical diseases in sub-Saharan Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution and disease burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 3: e412 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hotez PJ, Asojo OA, Adesina AM (2012) Nigeria: “Ground Zero” for the high prevalence neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1600 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Federal Ministry of Health (2013) Nigeria master plan for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) 2013–2017, Abuja: Federal Ministry of Health, 142 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. WHO (2012) Research priorities for helminth infections: technical report of the TDR disease reference group on helminth infections. WHO Tech Rep Ser 972:1–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Utzinger J (2012) A research and development agenda for the control and elimination of human helminthiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1646 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.WHO (2012) Uniting to combat NTDs. Available at: http://www.unitingtocombatntds.org; accessed on 20 July 2014.
  • 16. Rollinson D, Knopp S, Levitz S, Stothard JR, Tchuem Tchuenté LA, et al. (2013) Time to set the agenda for schistosomiasis elimination. Acta Trop 128:423–440. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Webster JP, Molyneux DH, Hotez PJ, Fenwick A (2014) The contribution of mass drug administration to global health: past, present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369:20130434 10.1098/rstb.2013.0434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Noma M, Nwoke BEB, Nutall I, Tambala PA, Enyong P, et al. (2002) Rapid epidemiological mapping of onchocerciasis (REMO): its application by the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC). Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96:29–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ekpo UF, Hürlimann E, Schur N, Oluwole AS, Abe EM, et al. (2013) Mapping and prediction of schistosomiasis in Nigeria using compiled survey data and Bayesian geospatial modelling. Geospat Health 7:355–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Montresor A, Crompton DWT, Hall A, Bundy, Savioli L (1998) Guidelines for the evaluation of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and schistosomiasis at community level. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Schur N, Hürlimann E, Garba A, Traoré MS, Ndir O, et al. (2011) Geostatistical model-based estimates of schistosomiasis prevalence among individuals aged ≤20 years in West Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e1194 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN)/Columbia University, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), The World Bank, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Global rural-urban mapping project, version 1 (GRUMPv1): urban extents grid. Palisades, NY: Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), 2011. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/dataset/grump-v1-urban-extents; accessed on 20 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N (2009) Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 71:319–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lindgren F, Rue H, Lindstrom J (2011) An explicit link between Gaussian Markov random field: the stochastic partial differential equation approach. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 73:423–492. [Google Scholar]
  • 25. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Cameletti M, Lindgren F, Simpson D, Rue H (2013) Spatio-temporal modelling of particulate matter concentration through the SPDE approach. Adv Stat Anal 97:109–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Karagiannis-Voules DA, Scholte RGC, Guimarães LH, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P (2013) Bayesian geostatistical modelling of leishmaniasis incidence in Brazil. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2213 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Karagiannis-Voules DA, Biedermann P, Ekpo UF, Garba A, Langer E, et al. (2015) Spatial and temporal distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and geostatistical meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 15:74–84 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71004-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Karagiannis-Voules DA, Odermatt P, Biedermann P, Khieu V, Schär F, et al. (2015) Geostatistical modelling of soil-transmitted helminth infection in Cambodia: do socioeconomic factors improve predictions? Acta Trop 141:204–212. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gneiting T, Raftery AE (2007) Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J Am Statist Assoc 102:359–378. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Held L, Schrödle B, Rue H (2010) Posterior and cross-validatory predictive checks: a comparison of MCMC and INLA In: Tutz G, Kneib T, eds. Statistical modelling and regression structures—Festschrift in honour of Ludwig Fahrmeir. Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp 91–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Rue H, Held L (2005) Gaussian Markov random fields: theory and applications. London: Chapman and Hall—CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Giardina F, Gosoniu L, Konate L, Diouf MB, Perry R, et al. (2012) Estimating the burden of malaria in Senegal: Bayesian zero-inflated binomial geostatistical modeling of the MIS 2008 data. PLoS One 7:e32625 10.1371/journal.pone.0032625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Schur N, Vounatsou P, Utzinger J (2012) Determining treatment needs at different spatial scales using geostatistical model-based risk estimates of schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1773 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Patil AP, Gething PW, Piel FB, Hay SI (2011) Bayesian geostatistics in health cartography: the perspective of malaria. Trends Parasitol 27:246–253. 10.1016/j.pt.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brooker S, Kabatereine NB, Smith JL, Mupfasoni D, Mwanje MT, et al. (2009) An updated atlas of human helminth infections: the example of East Africa. Int J Health Geogr 8:42 10.1186/1476-072X-8-42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chammartin F, Scholte RGC, Malone JB, Bavia ME, Nieto P, et al. (2013) Modelling the geographical distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Bolivia. Parasit Vectors 6:152 10.1186/1756-3305-6-152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. WHO (2012) Eliminating soil-transmitted helminthiasis as a public health problem in children Progress report 2001–2010 and strategic plan 2011–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hodges MH, Soares Magalhães RJ, Paye J, Koroma JB, Sonnie M, et al. (2012) Combined spatial prediction of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Sierra Leone: a tool for integrated disease control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1694 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Brooker S, Kabatereine NB, Gyapong JO, Stothard JR, Utzinger J (2009) Rapid mapping of schistosomiasis and other neglected tropical diseases in the context of integrated control programmes in Africa. Parasitology 136:1707–1718. 10.1017/S0031182009005940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Evans D, McFarland D, Adamani W, Eigege A, Miri E, et al. (2011) Cost-effectiveness of triple drug administration (TDA) with praziquantel, ivermectin and albendazole for the prevention of neglected tropical diseases in Nigeria. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 105:537–547. 10.1179/2047773211Y.0000000010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Mwinzi, Montgomery SP, Owaga CO, Mwanje M, Muok EM (2012) Integrated community-directed intervention for schistosomiasis and soil transmitted helminths in western Kenya—a pilot study. Parasit Vectors 5:182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Truscott JE, Hollingsworth TD, Brooker SJ, Anderson RM (2014) Can chemotherapy alone eliminates the transmission of soil transmitted helminths? Parasit Vectors 7:266 10.1186/1756-3305-7-266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tchuem Tchuenté LA (2012) Control of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in sub-Saharan Africa: challenges and prospects In: Current Topics in Tropical Medicine, Rodriguez-Morales A (ed.); ISBN: 978-953-51-0274-8, InTech; http://www.intechopen.com/books/currenttopics-in-tropical-medicine/control-of-schistosomiasis-and-soil-transmitted-helminths-in-sub-saharan-africachallenges-and-prosp; accessed on 20 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Schur N, Hürlimann E, Stensgaard AS, Chimfwembe K, Mushinge G, et al. (2013) Spatially explicit Schistosoma infection risk in eastern Africa using Bayesian geostatistical modelling. Acta Trop 128:365–377. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Tchuem Tchuenté LA (2011) Control of soil-transmitted helminths in sub-Saharan Africa: diagnosis, drug efficacy concerns and challenges. Acta Trop 120:S4–S11. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.World Bank (2013) Nigeria Overview. http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/overview; accessed on 20 July 2014.
  • 48. Otto GF (1929) A study of the moisture requirements of the eggs of the horse, the dog, human and pig ascarids. Am J Hyg 10:497–520. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Spindler LA (1929) The relation of moisture to the distribution of human Trichuris and Ascaris . Am J Hyg 10: 476–496. [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lai YS, Zhou XN, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P (2013) Bayesian geostatistical modelling of soil-transmitted helminth survey data in the People’s Republic of China. Parasit Vectors 6: 359 10.1186/1756-3305-6-359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Pullan RL, Gething PW, Smith JL, Mwandawiro CS, Sturrock HJW, et al. (2011) Spatial modelling of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Kenya: a disease control planning tool. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5:e958 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000958 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Schur N, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P (2011) Modelling age-heterogeneous Schistosoma haematobium and S. mansoni survey data via alignment factors. Parasit Vectors 4:142 10.1186/1756-3305-4-142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Chammartin F, Hürlimann E, Raso G, N’Goran EK, Utzinger J, Vounatsou P (2013) Statistical methodological issues in mapping historical schistosomiasis survey data. Acta Trop 128:345–352. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. The effect of land surface temperature (LST) at night.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Maps of environmental co-variates used in the model.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Population-adjusted and Pixel treatment requirement per local government areas (LGAs) in Nigeria.

(DOCX)

S1 Text. Details of analysis conducted.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All disease data are available from the http://www.gntd.org/ database after registration, and from the Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria: Contact Dr Obiageli Nebe (nebeoj@yahoo.com).


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES