Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 23;290(17):10572–10586. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.637827

TABLE 2.

Structure statistics

Dataset CBM46-SeMet peak CBM46 native Cel5B
Wavelength (Å) 0.9798 0.9200 0.9795
Resolution range (Å) 85.45–2.3 (2.382–2.3) 85.69–2.46 (2.548–2.46) 70.97–1.64 (1.699–1.64)
Space group I 41 2 2 I 41 2 2 P 21 21 2
Unit cell 120.85 120.85 76.38 90 90 90 121.19 121.19 77.28 90 90 90 74.22, 141.84, 50.82 90 90 90
Total reflections 246,067 (9270) 87,997 (9188) 480,050 (33,097)
Unique reflections 12861 (1250) 10723 (1059) 66600 (4833)
Multiplicity 19.1 (7.5) 8.2 (7.7) 7.2 (6.8)
Completeness (%) 99.96 (99.68) 99.74 (99.91) 99.9 (99.8)
Mean I/σ(I) 17.08 (3.83) 9.66 (1.24) 19.7 (2.6)
Wilson B-factor 34.00 56.48 13.99
Rmergea 12.4 (79.9) 12 7.3 (74.3)
Rp.i.m. b 2.9 (30.4) 4.6 (61.5) 4.4 (45.7)
CC½c 0.997 (0.89) 0.998 (0.613) 0.998 (0.60)
Average mosaicity 0.23 1.53 0.77
Reflections used for Rfree 629 (54) 519 (51) 2943 (211)
Rwork 0.2039 (0.2737) 0.2143 (0.4199) 0.1543 (0.1809)
Rfree 0.2545 (0.3116) 0.2400 (0.4382) 0.2460 (0.256)
CC(work) 0.945 0.956 0.970
CC(free) 0.920 0.947 0.962
No. of non-hydrogen atoms 1752 1669 4979
Macromolecules 1688 1646 4372
Ligands 5 0 68
Water 59 23 499
Protein residues 213 210 534
r.m.s. (bonds) 0.016 0.012 0.050
r.m.s. (angles) 1.83 1.41 1.07
Ramachandran favored (%) 90 90 97
Ramachandran allowed (%) 5 9 3
Ramachandran outliers (%) 5 1 1
ClashScore 15.60 2.20 5.08
Average B-factor 56.40 70.10 19.39
Macromolecules 56.80 70.30 19.10
Ligands 52.70 0 38.60
Solvent 44.40 55.30 31.60
PDB code 4uz8 4uzn 4v2x

a Rmerge = ΣhklΣi(Ii(hkl) − 〈Ihkl)〉)/ΣhklΣi(Ii(hkl), where Ii(hkl) is the ith intensity measurement of reflection hkl, including symmetry-related reflections, and 〈(I(hkl)〉 is its average.

b Rp.i.m. = (Σhkl√1/n − 1/Σj = 1n|Ihkl, j − 〈Ihkl〉|)/(ΣhklΣ Ihkl, j, where 〈Ihkl〉 is the average of symmetry-related observations of a unique reflection.

c CC½ is the half-data set correlation coefficient (51).

d Values for the outer shell are given in parentheses. Structure refinement was carried out using REFMAC5 (52), interspersed with manual rebuilding using COOT (53). In the penultimate round, the models were optimized using the PDB_REDO server (54). In the final round, each module (GH5, Ig_Like and CBM46) was treated as a single group for anisotropic TLS refinement.