Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;10(4):e0124275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124275

Table 4. Association between medication adherence using the MALMAS and glycemic control.

Adherence HbA1c Mean rank z value/ H2 Good control Poor control χ2 Odds ratio
(N = 134) Mean + SD [Median] (p value) HbA1c < 7% HbA1c > 7% (p value) (95% CI)
n (%) n (%)
High adherence 8.00 ± 1.87 [7.60] 57.51 6.073 a 13 (39.4) 28 (27.7) 5.01 -
Medium adherence 8.48 ± 2.08 [8.10] 67.20 (0.048*) 16 (48,5) 41 (40.6) (0.081)
Low adherence 8.98 ± 1.86 [8.55] 79.35 4 (12.1) 32 (31.7)
Medium and high adherence 8.28 ± 2.00 [7.90] 63.15 -2.142 b 29 (87.9) 69 (68.3) 4.84 3.362
Low adherence 8.97 ± 1.86 [8.55] 79.35 (0.032c) 4 (12.1) 32 (31.7) (0.028*) (1.090–10.370)
High adherence 8.00 ± 1.87 [7.60] 57.51 -1.978 b 13 (39.4) 28 (27.7) 1.59 1.695
Low and medium adherence 8.67 ± 2.00 [8.40] 71.90 (0.048c) 20 (60.6) 73 (72.3) (0.207) (0.744–3.859)

* p < 0.05; SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval

a H2 value—Kruskal-Wallis H Test; was performed when there was more than 2 groups of adherence levels;

b z value—Mann-Whitney U Test; was performed when there was 2 groups of adherence levels;