Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 16;40(3):197–206. doi: 10.1503/jpn.140081

Table 4.

Pairwise comparisons of the regions with a significant effect of group on volume*

CUD v. control NCUD v. control CUD v. NCUD



Brain region β SEβ p value d β SEβ p value d β SEβ p value d
Amygdala§ −276.00 34.50 < 0.001 1.24 −355.55 45.50 < 0.001 1.73 −79.60 45.46 0.08
Putamen§ −505.79 117.45 < 0.001 0.70 −926.14 154.97 < 0.001 1.33 −420.36 154.83 0.007 0.52
Insula −427.10 107.9 < 0.001 0.57 −197.00 142.40 0.17 230.13 142.27 0.11
Parahippocampal gyrus −241.71 48.25 < 0.001 0.76 −409.40 63.66 < 0.001 1.23 −167.69 63.60 0.009
Fusiform gyrus −1024.10 195.80 < 0.001 0.80 −1238.32 258.38 < 0.001 0.87 −214.19 258.14 0.41

CUD = cannabis use disorder; NCUD = no cannabis use disorder; SEβ = standard error of β.

*

All results are adjusted for age, slice thickness and intracranial volume. Significant from p < 0.01.

Adjusted mean difference between the 2 groups.

Calculated only for significant regions of interest.

§

Based on the FreeSurfer segmentation output.

Based on the FreeSurfer Desikan-Killiany Atlas.