Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Immun. 2015 Jan 29;16(3):213–220. doi: 10.1038/gene.2014.84

Table 3.

Sensitivity analyses: alternative logistic regression models for 1,277 subjects (515 Rwandans and 762 Zambians).

Baseline model: 478 seropositives vs. 799 seronegativesb Interim model: 678 seropositives vs. 599 seronegatives-c
Factorsa in model OR 95% CI Adjusted P OR 95% CI Adjusted P
Age >40 years 1.18 0.84–1.68 0.343 0.85 0.61–1.20 0.363
Female sex 1.07 0.85–1.37 0.557 1.20 0.95–1.51 0.129
Country (Rwanda) 3.50 1.27–9.62 0.015 1.18 0.44–3.13 0.742
rs12407485-A 0.71 0.55–0.90 0.005d 0.69 0.55–0.87 0.002d
a

As defined in Table 1 and text. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) are further adjusted for genetic ancestry (MDS1-MDS4, see text). OR >1.0 is unfavorable (being seropositive).

b

At enrollment, only SPs (n = 478) are HIV-1 seropositive, while the other subjects (n = 799) are seronegative.

c

Up to two years of follow-up after enrollment, with 200 confirmed seroconversion events (as in Figure 3).

d

P ≥0.19 when corrected for 95 independent tests.