Table 2.
Hierarchical Linear models: Associations of baseline neighborhood socioeconomic status and relative income with allostatic load at wave 2.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | S.E. | p | Estimate | S.E. | p | Estimate | S.E. | p | Estimate | S.E. | p | Estimate | S.E. | p | Estimate | S.E. | p | |
| Relative Income a | -0.052 | 0.027 | 0.05 | -0.076 | 0.030 | 0.01 | -0.056 | 0.029 | 0.05 | -0.063 | 0.033 | 0.06 | -0.068 | 0.033 | 0.04 | -0.044 | 0.028 | 0.10’ |
| NSES Fact or b | -0.039 | 0.052 | 0.48 | -0.120 | 0.061 | 0.05 | -0.076 | 0.057 | 0.18 | -0.086 | 0.061 | 0.16 | -0.093 | 0.061 | 0.13 | -0.060 | 0.050 | 0.23 |
| Age (centered at 45 y) Gender (ref = female) | 0.063 | 0.007 | <0.0001 | 0.063 | 0. 007 | <0.0001 | 0.060 | 0.008 | <0.0001 | 0.029 | 0.007 | <0.0001 | ||||||
| Male | 0.262 | 0.123 | 0.03 | 0.258 | 0.123 | 0.04 | 0.280 | 0.123 | 0.03 | 0.172 | 0.106 | 0.11 | ||||||
| IPR | 0.057 | 0.128 | 0.66 | 0.049 | 0.128 | 0.70 | -0.010 | 0.109 | 0.93 | |||||||||
| Length of residence | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.08 | 0.009 | 0.007 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| City of residence | 0.043 | 0.107 | 0.69 | -0.038 | 0.087 | 0.67 | ||||||||||||
| Baseline AL | 0.557 | 0.026 | <0.0001 | |||||||||||||||
| Sample Size | a 1030 | 1030 | 1030 | 1030 | 1030 | 929 | ||||||||||||
| b 1089 | ||||||||||||||||||
Model 1: Relative Income or NSES Factor
Model 2: Relative Income + NSES Factor
Model 3: Model 2 + Age + Gender
Model 4: Model 3 + individual SES
Model 5: Model 4 + length of residence + city of residence
Model 6: Model 5 + Baseline AL
Income modeled as a 1-unit increase in the variable corresponds to a $10,000 increase
NSES (neighborhood socioeconomic status) factor is standardized, so a 1 unit increase corresponds to a 1-SD increase in NSES