Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2015 Apr 8;86(2):578–590. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.018

Figure 3. Consistent subregional correlation across subjects and task runs.

Figure 3

Task correlation matrices for all parietal electrode pairs are shown for each subject (A) (correlations averaged across two task runs). B) Mean task correlation values between parietal subregions across subjects are shown for the first (left) and second (right) task runs. Correlation matrices for each task run show a highly similar pattern of correlation between regions (Run-1 vs. Run-2 matrix similarity, r = 0.91, p<0.001, n = 21), whereby correlations are most pronounced between RSC/PCC and AG. C) Mean RSC/PCC-AG correlation (with standard error of mean) across subjects is shown for each task condition. Mean condition correlations suggest that all task conditions comodulated RSC/PCC and AG HFB responses, with the self-episodic condition producing the greatest correlation values (main effect of condition on RSC/PCC-AG correlation F(5, 405) = 9.11, p < 0.001). See also Figure S6.