Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 7;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12014-015-9078-5

Table 3.

Validation of the NDCUH database

No. of isolates Before the NDCUH introduction After the NDCUH introduction
Species level Genus level No match Species level Genus level No match
N. abscessus 2 2 1 1
N. aobensis 2 1 1 2
N. arthritidis 2 2 1 1
N.a asiatica 3 2 1 3
N. asteroides 2 2 2
N. beijingensis 2 2 2
N. brasiliensis 2 2 2
N. concava 2 1 1 1 1
N. cyriacigeorgica 4 4 4
N. elegans 4 3 1 4
N. exalbida 2 2 2
N. farcinica 7 7 7
N. niigatensis 2 2 2
N. nova 8 5 3 7 1
N. otitidiscaviarum 3 2 1 3
N. paucivorans 1 1 1
N. pseudobrasiliensis 2 2 1 1
N. puris 3 3 3
N. transvalensis 2 1 1 1 1
N. veterana 2 1 1 2
N. vinacea 2 2 2
N. wallacei 5 5 5
Total 64 10 (15.6%) 16 (25.0%) 38 (59.4%) 58 (90.6%) 6 (9.4%) 0 (0.0%)

A total of 64 Nocardia isolates, independent of the isolates used to construct the NDCUH, were subjected to identification based on the NECLC method; identification results before and after introduction of the NDCUH database were compared. Before the introduction, the original Bruker Biotyper ver. 3.3.1.0 database was used. In the table, the species level count indicates isolates that could be identified at both the species and genus levels; the genus level count includes not only isolates that could be identified to the genus level but those that could not be identified to the species level.