Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Feb;14(2):455. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0455-z

Table 2.

Ethnic Differences in Hyperglycemic Markers and Metabolic Indices in Youth

Hyperglycemic Marker Metabolic Indices
Latino (n=206) [83••]b 6–6.4% vs. <6.0% 21% Inline graphic SI
30% Inline graphic Insulin Secretion
31% Inline graphic DI
5.7–6.4% vs. <5.7% ≈ SI
≈ AIR
≈ DI
Caucasian & AA (n=204) [84••]c 5.7–6.4% vs. <5.7% 18% Inline graphic SI
30% Inline graphic GDI

Caucasian & AA (n=223) [87•]c ≥90–99 mg/dL vs. <90 mg/dL fasting ≈ SI
Inline graphic Insulin Secretion
23% Inline graphic GDId
Caucasian & AA (n=113) [88]c ≥155 mg/dL vs. <155 mg/dL at 1-hr post OGTT ≈ SI
≈ Insulin Secretion
35.5% Inline graphic GDId
Caucasian (n=1,454) [90] ≥132 mg/dL vs. <132 mg/dL at 1-hr post OGTT Inline graphic DIe
Latino (n=233, 9-yr longitudinal) [89••]b ≥155 mg/dL vs. <155 mg/dL at 1hr post OGTT ≈ SI
Inline graphic Insulin Secretion
Inline graphic DI
Caucasian & AA (n=147) [91]a,c ≥120 mg/dL vs. <120 mg/dL at 2-hr post OGTT ≈ SI
≈ Insulin Secretion
40% Inline graphic GDId
Caucasian, non-diabetic (n=60, 2-yr longitudinal) [92••]c 120–139 mg/dL vs. 100–199 vs. <100 mg/dL at 2-hr post OGTT Inline graphic SI
Inline graphic Insulin Secretion
a

Study included non-diabetic and diabetic children;

b

Studies used FSIVGTT with minimal modeling (Disposition index [DI] = insulin sensitivity [SI] * acute insulin response [AIR]);

c

Studies compared hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity by [6,6-2H2] glucose and a 3-h hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp and β-cell function by a 2-h hyperglycemic clamp (~225 mg/dL).

d

Glucose disposition index (GDI) was expressed relative to insulin sensitivity (GDI = SI * first-phase insulin).

e

DI was calculated from a regression equation using data from an OGTT.