Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 21;122(5):741–753. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13283

Table 3.

Adverse perinatal outcomes (‘intrapartum composite’) for babies of ‘higher risk’ women by parity and planned place of birth

Events Births Weighted* Unadjusted* Adjusted**
n n n/1000 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI
All ‘higher risk’ women (‘population 1’)
Overall (Wald test for interaction = 0.88***)
 OU 29 6648 4.2 2.9–6.1 1
 Home 12 1471 7.1 4.1–12.2 1.68 0.87–3.25 1.92 0.97–3.80
Nulliparous
 OU 15 2508 6.0 3.7–9.7 1
 Home 4 284 10.6 4.2–26.8 1.77 0.62–5.05
Parous
 OU 14 4140 3.1 1.8–5.5 1
 Home 8 1187 6.2 3.0–12.9 1.99 0.79–5.00
‘Higher risk’ women without ‘complicating conditions’ (‘population 2’)
Overall (Wald test for interaction = 0.53***)
 OU 18 4715 3.8 2.6–5.6 1
 Home 10 1312 6.7 3.6–12.4 1.75 0.84–3.62 2.05 0.98–4.29
Nulliparous
 OU 10 1528 6.5 3.7–11.5 1
 Home 3 249 9.2 3.0–27.6 1.41 0.41–4.87
Parous
 OU 8 3187 2.5 1.3–4.8 1
 Home 7 1063 6.1 2.8–13.4 2.43 0.88–6.71
*

Probability weights are incorporated to account for differences in the probability of a woman being selected for inclusion in the study arising from differences in each unit/trust's period of participation and the stratum-specific probabilities of selection of OUs.

**

Adjusted for parity.

***

P-value for interaction between parity and planned place of birth.