Table 5.

ABR-behavioral differences (dB) for each correction factor by frequency and degree of hearing loss

Correction approach	500 Hz = F (6,554) = 437.103, p < 0.001, η2p= 0.828
	Normal	Mild	Moderate	Severe-Profound
ABR/BEH	−6.8	−12.6	−22.6	−28.6
Behavioral	8.2	2.4	−7.6	−13.6
Linear regression	4.2	1.3	−6	−5
Correction approach	1000 Hz = F (6,448) = 417.35, p < 0.001, η2p= 0.848
	Normal	Mild	Moderate	Severe-Profound
ABR/BEH	0.8	−5.9	−12.9	−15.6
Behavioral	10.7	4.1	−2.9	−5.6
Linear regression	4.5	−.4	−5.2	−3.1
Correction approach	2000 Hz = F (6,338) = 427.13, p < 0.001, η2p= 0.883
	Normal	Mild	Moderate	Severe-Profound
ABR/BEH	5.1	−4.7	−9.5	−11.4
Behavioral	10.1	0.4	−4.5	−6.4
Linear regression	5.3	−2.8	−5.3	−1.2
Correction approach	4000 Hz = F (3,159) = 323.43, p < 0.001, η2p= 0.859
	Normal	Mild	Moderate	Severe-Profound
Behavioral	8.7	1.5	−3.9	−6.2
Linear regression	3.6	−1.3	−4.7	−1.8

Model statistics represent the interaction between correction approach and degree of hearing loss at each frequency

Minimum mean significant differences based on Tukey’s HSD, 0.5 dB at 500 Hz, 0.4 dB at 1000 Hz, 0.4 dB at 2000 Hz and 0.3 at 4000 Hz

Negative numbers indicate lower ABR threshold than behavioral threshold.