Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr;27(2):209–217. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.03.04

Table 2. Comparison of DCE-MRI findings between patients with IBC and DCIS.

DCE-MRI findings n (%)
P
DCIS (n=11) IBC (n=53)
Signal intensity on FS-T2WI
   Hyperintensity 8 (72.72%) 43 (81.13%) 0.577
   Moderate 2 (18.18%) 5 (9.43%)
   Hypointensity 1 (9.09%) 5 (9.43%)
Enhancement style
   Mass-like enhancement 4 (36.36%) 51 (96.23%) <0.001
   Non-mass-like enhancement 7 (63.63%) 2 (3.92%)
Initial enhancement characteristics
   Homogeneous 9 (81.82%) 15 (28.30%) 0.003
   Heterogeneous 1 (9.09%) 18 (33.96%)
   Rim enhancement 1 (9.09%) 20 (37.74%)
Maximum slop of increase (×102)
   Mean 9.31 11.35 0.299
   Standard deviation 3.41 4.11
Time to peak (min)
   ≤2 6 (54.54%) 45 (84.91%) 0.024
   >2 5 (45.45%) 8 (15.09%)
TIC curve (type I or not)
   I 3 (27.27%) 2 (3.77%) 0.009
   II, III 8 (72.73%) 51 (96.23%)

Abbreviations: DCE-MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; DCIS, breast ductal carcinoma in situ; IBC, invasive breast carcinoma; TIC, time signal intensity curve.