Table 3.
Logistic regression for Active Commuting (yes/no) (n = 748).
| Variable | Association with AC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | p | |
| Individual variables | |||
| Age | 0.94 | 0.89–0.98 | 0.008 |
| Number of children | 0.49 | 0.28–0.88 | 0.02 |
| Sex | |||
| Male (referent) | 1 | ||
| Female | 0.68 | 0.28–1.63 | 0.43 |
| Race/ethnicity | |||
| Non-Hispanic White (referent) | 1 | ||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 3.61 | 0.40–32.84 | 0.25 |
| Other racial/ethnic group | 2.23 | 0.38–12.94 | 0.37 |
| Income level | |||
| <$30 K/year (referent) | 1 | ||
| $30–60 K/year | 0.55 | 0.05–6.53 | 0.64 |
| >$60 K/year | 3.14 | 0.22–45.08 | 0.4 |
| Marital status | |||
| Not married | 3.63 | 1.12–11.74 | 0.03 |
| Married (referent) | 1 | ||
| Number of cars in the household | 1.28 | 0.68–2.40 | 0.44 |
| Self-efficacy for bicycling skills | 1.11 | 0.68–1.81 | 0.67 |
| AC behavioral beliefs score | 1.02 | 0.98–1.06 | 0.35 |
| Perceived behavioral control for AC | 1.25 | 1.15–1.36 | <0.001 |
| Public transit use | |||
| NPTR (referrent) | 1 | ||
| PTR | 12.29 | 3.59–42.10 | <0.001 |
| Interpersonal variables | |||
| Spouse AC (times/week) | 1.53 | 1.19–1.96 | 0.001 |
| Perceived coworker AC | 1.45 | 0.81–2.60 | 0.21 |
| Worksite variables | |||
| Perceived employer support for AC | 1.28 | 0.90–1.84 | 0.17 |
| Community variables | |||
| Perceived pedestrian friendliness for AC | 1.17 | 0.83–1.64 | 0.37 |
| Perceived bike time to work | |||
| More than 20 min (referent) | 1 | ||
| Less than 20 min | 7.23 | 2.59–20.17 | <0.001 |
| Environment variables | |||
| Lack of on street bike lanes | 1.86 | 1.08–3.21 | 0.02 |
| Lack of sidewalks | 0.65 | 0.40–1.08 | 0.1 |
| Speed and volume of traffic along route | 0.59 | 0.37–0.95 | 0.03 |
| Perceived crime along route | 1.1 | 0.71–1.70 | 0.66 |
| Difficult terrain | 1.16 | 0.77–1.74 | 0.48 |
| Bad weather | 1.86 | 1.28–2.70 | 0.001 |
Note: OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, AC: active commuting, PTR: public transit rider, NPTR: Non public transit rider.