Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Plant Physiol. 2014 Jul 8;171(15):1436–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.06.013

Table 1.

Ultrastructural analysis of the leaves of studied plants. The average values (± SE) are replicates of six independent measurements with different plants.

Treatment Cell wall thickness (μm) Chloroplast length (μm) Chloroplast area (μm2) Mitochondrion length (μm) Ratio of starch grain area to chloroplast area (%)
Petroselinum crispum
Control 0.300 ± 0.07 6.78 ± 0.12 13.31 ± 0.22 1.00 ± 0.27 8.93 ± 0.13
860 – 910 MHz 0.250 ± 0.06 6.76 ± 0.28 8.491 ± 0.06 0.90 ± 0.13 9.99 ± 0.12
2.4 - 2.5 GHz 0.200 ± 0.05 6.50 ± 0.16 7.807 ± 0.11 0.70 ± 0.05 6.01 ± 0.08

Anethum graveolens
Control 0.187 ± 0.01 5.90 ± 0.13 8.43 ± 0.23 1.68 ± 0.13 5.21 ± 0.13
860 – 910 MHz 0.175 ± 0.01 5.20 ± 0.17 8.08 ± 0.29 1.00 ± 0.25 8.13 ± 0.08
2.4 - 2.5 GHz 0.175 ± 0.01 4.85 ± 0.31 7.04 ± 0.22 0.80 ± 0.10 0

Apium graveolens
Control 0.160 ± 0.01 5.80 ± 0.20 7.68 ± 0.14 1.57 ± 0.08 5.34 ± 0.28
860 – 910 MHz 0.156 ± 0.01 4.33 ± 0.26 7.06 ± 0.35a 0.55 ± 0.13 0
2.4 - 2.5 GHz 0.136 ± 0.01 3.33 ± 0.26 6.68 ± 0.14 0.25 ± 0.13 0