Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 7;31(9):1396–1404. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv006

Table 2.

The classification accuracy [see Equation (16)] for Dataset II obtained with the CSSS (1-NN classifier) and the six other models: PhymmBL (Brady and Salzberg, 2009), PhyloPythiaS (Patil et al., 2011), NBC (Rosen et al., 2011), Kraken (Wood and Salzberg, 2014), RAIphy (Nalbantoglu et al., 2011) and PAUDA (Huson and Xie, 2014) when predicting the phyla for 20 907 reads belonging to Leptospirillum sp. groups II and III genomes (18 579 reads) and Ferroplasma acidarmanus genome (2328 reads)

Classifier Euryarchaeota accuracy (%) Nitrospirae accuracy (%)
CSSS 87.03 96.66
PhymmBL 81.14 97.67
PhyloPythiaS 72.76 95.42
NBC 16.15 82.07
Kraken 0.26 77.14
RAIphy 1.03 66.99
PAUDA 4.38 8.41