Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 May 21;40(9):2113–2124. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.027

Table 1.

Pulsed focused ultrasound exposure parameters for different treatment groups

Treatment type p+ (MPa) p (MPa) PRF (Hz) ISPPA (W/cm2) ISPTA(W/cm2) ΔT(°C) Δx (µm)
Low20 19 7 20 1886 0.2 0.0005 0.09
High20 31 9 20 3554 0.38 0.001 0.18
Low80 19 7 80 1886 0.8 0.0005 0.09
High80 31 9 80 3554 1.5 0.001 0.18
Low1k* 3 2.6 1000 125 0.8 4e-5 0.006
High1k* 5 3.5 1000 283 1.5 9e-5 0.014

p+ and p = peak positive and peak negative pressures in the waveform, respectively; PRF = pulse repetition frequency; ISPPA = spatial peak, pulse average intensity;ISPTA= spatial peak, time averaged intensity; ΔT = estimated maximum temperature elevation in muscle resulting from a single ultrasound pulse; Δx = estimated muscle tissue displacement resulting from radiation force exerted by a single ultrasound pulse.

*

The Low1k and Highlk exposures were designed to mimic the PRF used in low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatments (1 kHz), and have the same ISPTA values as Low80 and High80 exposures. In comparison, the LIPUS treatments typically operate at ISATA of 5–100 mW/cm2 and 20% duty factor. LIPUS intensity of 100 mW/cm2 was found to be the minimum intensity that mitigated bone loss in osteopenic animals (Ferreri et al. 2011).