Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 27;11(4):e1004848. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004848

Fig 1. Bioinformatic comparison and phylogenetic analysis of Hikaru genki (Hig) in insects.

Fig 1

(A) Percentage of amino acid identity between AaHig and Drosophila melanogaster Hig (DmHig). (B) Schematic representation of AaHig and DmHig. The functional modules were predicted using the SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/smart/set_mode.cgi?GENOMIC=1) and Pfam (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/) websites. (C) Unrooted phylogenetic tree of insect Higs. The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining (NJ) method based on the alignment of insect Hig protein sequences. The bootstrap values of 5000 replicates are indicated on the branch nodes. Drosophila spp. (Dr.); Ceratitis spp. (Ct.); Musca spp. (Mu); Anopheles spp. (An.); Aedes spp. (Ae.); Culex spp. (Cx); Tribolium spp. (Tr.); Dendroctonus spp. (De.); Nasonia spp. (Na.); Cerapachys spp. (Cp.); Camponotus spp. (Ca.); Acromyrmex spp. (Ac.); Solenopsis spp. (So.); Megachile spp. (Me.); Bombus spp. (Bu.); Apis spp. (Ap.); Danaus spp. (Da.); Bombyx spp. (By.).