Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0123244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123244

Table 3. TNFA, IFNG and TNFRSF1A gene polymorphisms in CD.

Gene dbSNP MAF a Genotypes Cases b Controls c Dominant model Recessive model
n (freq) n (freq) p-value (2df) OR d (95%CI) p-value (2df) OR d (95%CI)
TNFA -1031T>C C (0.027) C/C 9 (0.04) 22 (0.08) 0.027 0.65(0.44–0.95) 0.042 0.41 (0.17–0.97)
T/C 73 (0.30) 97 (0.36)
T/T 162 (0.66) 148 (0.56)
-857C>T T (0.153) T/T 3 (0.01) 8 (0.03) <0.0001 0.42 (0.27–0.65) 0.316 0.48 (0.12–2.01)
C/T 45 (0.19) 89 (0.33)
C/C 196 (0.8) 170 (0.64)
-376G>A A (0.047) A/A 2 (0.01) 0 (-) 0.023 2.25 (1.12–4.51) - -
G/A 28 (0.11) 16 (0.06)
G/G 214 (0.88) 251 (0.94)
-308G>A A (0.216) A/A 20 (0.08) 3 (0.01) <0.0001 4.76 (3.12–7.26) 0.001 10.09 (2.71–37.55)
G/A 117 (0.48) 58 (0.22)
G/G 107 (0.44) 206 (0.77)
-238G>A A (0.068) A/A 2 (0.01) 1 (0.01) 0.241 1.41 (0.80–2.46) 0.841 1.28 (0.11–14.67)
G/A 34 (0.14) 29 (0.11)
G/G 208 (0.85) 237 (0.88)
IFNG +874A>T T (0.458) T/T 52 (0.21) 56 (0.21) 0.929 0.98 (0.65–1.48) 0.810 1.06 (0.67–1.68)
A/T 116 (0.48) 136 (0.51)
A/A 76 (0.31) 75 (0.28)
TNFRSF1A c.625+10A>G A (0.363) G/G 17 (0.33) 26 (0.39) 0.739 1.16 (0.47–2.76) 0.061 0.21 (0.04–1.07)
G/A 32 (0.63) 31 (0.47)
A/A 2 (0.04) 9 (0.14)

p values in boldface are significant

aMAF = minor allele frequency

bCases: n = 244; n = 51 for TNFRSF1A

cControls: n = 267; n = 66 for TNFRSF1A

dOR = Odds Ratio; 95%CI = 95% Confidence Intervals. Odds Ratios were calculated by binary logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender and H. pylori infection.