Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0122746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122746

Table 5. Descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and effect sizes for individual NAB tests (demographically-adjusted T scores).

Uncomplicated MTBI Complicated MTBI
M SD M SD p d Effect Size
Oral Production 50.6 8.5 50.5 8.6 .953 .02 Very Small
Naming 52.5 8.4 51.0 9.8 .532 .16 Small
Visual Discrimination 52.0 8.6 51.7 7.5 .888 .04 Very Small
Design Construction 54.5 9.6 54.6 9.1 .935 .02 Very Small
Digits Forwards 50.0 7.2 53.7 9.0 .083 .45 Medium
Digits Backwards 53.0 6.0 54.2 9.6 .538 .16 Small
Dots 57.6 7.1 56.3 7.7 .494 .18 Small
Driving Scenes 51.3 10.7 49.9 8.9 .589 .14 Very Small
N&L Efficiency Part D 51.4 10.1 50.4 13.3 .740 .09 Very Small
N&L Efficiency Part A 54.1 9.3 52.9 10.5 .647 .12 Very Small
N&L Efficiency Part B 54.4 7.1 53.0 9.4 .524 .16 Small
N&L Efficiency Part C 50.1 8.2 48.2 9.2 .410 .21 Small
List Learning Immediate 49.9 8.6 50.8 8.6 .691 .10 Very Small
Shape Learning Immediate 53.1 9.6 54.5 7.4 .534 .16 Small
Daily Living Immediate 47.8 9.4 51.9 9.6 .095 .43 Medium
Story Learning Immediate 49.7 9.1 50.9 9.9 .622 .13 Very Small
List Learning Delay 52.2 12.0 53.5 10.9 .652 .12 Very Small
Shape Learning Delay 52.4 8.8 53.0 9.4 .792 .07 Very Small
Daily Living Delay 46.1 13.0 48.3 9.5 .452 .19 Small
Story Learning Delay 50.5 6.3 50.6 7.4 .956 .01 Very Small
Mazes 53.0 7.3 52.0 7.4 .594 .14 Small
Categories 52.9 10.2 54.0 9.0 .673 .11 Very Small
Word Generation 53.5 11.2 50.0 8.7 .181 .35 Medium

Note: N = 62 (Uncomplicated MTBI, n = 31; Complicated MTBI, n = 31)

*Cohen’s [74] effect size (d): small (.20), medium (.50), large (.80).