Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 Jul 29;34(1):72–85. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2343953

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Quantitative comparisons of different schemes using (a) the signal to error ratio, and the (b) high frequency signal to error metrics on PINCAT phantom data. These metrics are evaluated in a square field of view that contains regions of heart as depicted in Fig. 4. These plots demonstrate that the DC-CS schemes outperform the CS schemes at all sub-sampling factors.