Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 21;3:e907. doi: 10.7717/peerj.907

Table 5. Neuroscan versus EPOC EEG system P3 and MMN peak comparisons.

Descriptive (n, M [lower, upper 95% confidence intervals]) and inferential (t or Wilcoxon Z and Cohen’s d) statistics for peak amplitude (µV) and latency (ms) measures produced by the Neuroscan and EPOC systems at F3/AF3 and F4/AF4 for the P3 ERP peak (to deviant tones in the active condition) and the MMN ERP component (the difference between ERPs to standard and deviant tones in the passive condition).

EEG System
ERP Measure Site n Neuroscan EPOC stat. d
P3 Amplitude F3/AF3 18 −2.30 [−4.2, −0.4] −2.46 [−4.1, −0.8] 0.45 0.04
F4/AF4 18 −2.51 [−4.5, −0.6] −2.46 [−4.3, −0.6] −0.11 0.01
Latency F3/AF3 18 336 [320, 352] 351 [333, 369] −2.91** 0.44
F4/AF4 18 338 [322, 354] 353 [337, 369] −3.53** 0.45
MMN Amplitude F3/AF3 18 −4.21 [−5.6, −2.9] −4.54 [−5.8, −3.3] 0.56 0.12
F4/AF4 18 −4.69 [−6.1, −3.3] −4.95 [−6.2, −3.7] 0.42 0.09
Latency F3/AF3 18 193 [179, 207] 198 [181, 215] −0.73 0.17
F4/AF4 18 191 [176, 206] 201 [185, 217] −1.19 0.29

Notes.

a

Wilcoxon Z.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.