Table 2.
Comparison of LE 0 improvement trends by annual gain (1985–2009 for Canada, 1985–2010 for other OECD countries) §
| Male | Female | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Country | Annual gain (days) | Country | Annual gain (days) |
| 1 | New Zealand | 123* | Japan | 90* |
| 2 | Austria | 110* | New Zealand | 88* |
| 3 | Australia | 108* | Italy | 87* |
| 4 | Italy | 107* | Austria | 86* |
| 5 | Switzerland | 105* | France | 79* |
| 6 | France | 100* | Spain | 78* |
| 7 | Norway | 96* | Australia | 77* |
| 8 | Sweden | 88 | Switzerland | 65* |
| 9 | Spain | 86 | Norway | 57* |
| 10 | Canada | 85 | Sweden | 54 |
| 11 | Netherlands | 82 | Canada | 48 |
| 12 | Japan | 70* | Netherlands | 38 |
§Annual improvement of LE0 in days is derived from the regression slope.
*P-value from testing hypothesis of equal slopes in comparison to Canada is considered significant (*) if less than 0.0045 after Bonferroni correction.