Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 28;6:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00539

Table 1.

Means and t-tests comparing ASD participants with “controls” on cognitive measures.

Measure (upper/lower limits) ASD (N = 15) mean (SD) Control mean (SD) (Sample) t-value (p)*
Numeracy (0–8) 5.20 (1.97) 4.88 (1.64) (N = 211) 0.72 (0.472)
Applying decision rules (0–7) 5.06 (1.49) 4.41 (1.68) (N = 211) 1.46 (0.146)
Attribute framing effect (–5 to 5) 0.46 (0.46) 0.33 (0.75) (N = 131) 0.96(0.348)
Risky choice framing effect (–5 to 5) 0.33 (1.29) 0.80 (2.10) (N = 131) –1.24 (0.229)
Rational ability (0–10) 3.70 (0.80) 3.79 (0.54) (N = 80) –0.42 (0.681)
Rational engagement (0–10) 3.78 (0.83) 3.51 (0.62) (N = 80) 1.46 (0.147)
Experiential ability (0–10) 2.80 (0.85) 3.43 (0.51) (N = 80) –2.78 (0.014)
Experiential engagement (0–10) 2.94 (0.62) 3.43 (0.52) (N = 80) –3.25 (0.002)
Cups task: risk taking on gain trials 12.60 (5.38) 16.95 (6.77) (N = 358) –2.46 (0.01)
Cups task: risk taking on loss trials 14.33 (7.02) 18.08 (5.93) (N = 358) 2.38 (0.02)
Cups task: RA-RD on gain trials 1.33 (3.46) 2.59 (2.89) (N = 358) 1.64 (0.10)
Cups task: RA-RD on loss trials 2.00 (2.53) 1.67 (2.91) (N = 358) 0.43 (0.666)

*t-tests were adjusted for unequal variance where appropriate.