Table 2.
Recommendation | Class | Level of evidence |
---|---|---|
1. Upgrade of conventional PM or ICD CRT is indicated in HF patients with | I | B |
LVEF <35% and a demand for high percentage of ventricular pacing who persist in the NYHA functional class | ||
III or IV even with optimized medical treatment | ||
2. CRT in a direct way CRT should be considered in patientis with HF, depressed LVEF and a demand for high percentage of ventricular pacing under risk of worsening od HF symptoms | IIa | B |
PM=pacemaker; ICD=mplantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT=cardiac resynchronization therapy; HF=heart failure; LVEF=left ventricular ejection graction; NYHA=New York Heart Association. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al.[3]