Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 May 6;7(3):453–460. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000690

Table 6.

Sensitivity Analysis: Estimated number-needed to treat and number-needed to harm with use of aspirin according to varying relative CHD risk reductions and varying absolute bleeding risk in MESA participants stratified by 10-year CHD risk and baseline CAC assuming.

MESA Participants Estimated 5-yr NNT Estimated 5-yr NNH
CHD risk < 10% 10% CHD risk reduction 20% CHD risk reduction 30% CHD risk reduction 0.5-fold bleeding risk Standard bleeding risk 2-fold bleeding risk 4-fold bleeding risk
CAC=0 (n=1,907) 3,664 1,832 1,222 883 442 221 148
CAC ≥ 100 (n=289) 311 156 104

CHD risk ≥ 10% 10% CHD risk reduction 20% CHD risk reduction 30% CHD risk reduction 0.5-fold bleeding risk Standard bleeding risk 2-fold bleeding risk 4-fold bleeding risk

CAC=0 (n=454) 1454 727 485 883 442 221 148
CAC ≥ 100(n=486) 165 83 55

Abbreviations: MESA – Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, CHD – Coronary Heart Disease, CAC – Coronary Artery Calcification, NNT – Number needed to treat, NNH – number needed to harm