Table 3.
Complication rates per type of complication
| Study | Patients with complicationsa | Recurrent/persistent fistula or UGS | Rectal prolapse | Vaginal stricture/stenosis | Wound dehiscence | Urethral stricture/stenosis | Anal stricture/stenosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
| Cho (n = 9) [14] | 4 (44 %) | 2 (22 %) | 1 (11 %) | ||||
| Julià (n = 6) [18] | 2 (33 %) | 2 (33 %) | |||||
| Leclair (n = 22) [16] | 10 (45 %) | 4 (18 %) | 3 (14 %) | 2 (9 %) | 5 (23 %) | ||
| Levitt (n = 220) [13] | 63 (29 %) | 13 (6 %) | 26 (12 %) | 18 (8 %) | 6 (3 %) | ||
| Liem (n = 10) [11] | 0 (%) | ||||||
| Matsui (n = 11) [17] | 1 (9 %) | 1 (9 %) | |||||
| Nakayama (n = 7) [15] | 4 (57 %) | 3 (43 %) | 1 (14 %) | 1 (14 %) | |||
| Versteegh (n = 42) [12] | 15 (36 %) | 7 (17 %) | 1 (2 %) | 8 (19 %) | |||
| Total (n = 327) | 99 (30 %) | 29 (10 %) | 27 (10 %) | 25 (9 %) | 9 (18 %) | 9 (3 %) | 5 (23 %) |
UGS urogenital sinus
aSome patients suffered from more than one complications