Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2009 Apr 14;72(4):815–829. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06690.x

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of substitutions in Region 2.4 of σ32 in suppressing promoter mutations at positions −14 and −13. A. Effect of W108A σ32 and W108R σ32 on the groE promoter with single-base changes at the −14 or −13 positions.

B. Effect of E112A σ32 on groE and grpE promoters with single-base changes at the −13 position.

C. Effect of E112A σ32 on groE promoter with a single-base changes at positions −14, −15 and −16. β-galactosidase activity driven by each σ32 variant from mutant groE or grpE promoters is shown as a percentage of β-galactosidase activity driven by each σ32 variant from the wt promoter. Assay strains are as described in Fig. 1A. Below the x-axis, mutation and position indicate the base change at the different promoter positions; promoter indicates the groE or grpE promoter; σ32 indicates the σ32 wt or mutant derivative. All values are averages of at least three independent experiments; error bars indicate one standard deviation.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure